Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/26/2016 6:29:05 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Olog-hai

because of the gender on their driver’s license. …
= = =
Issue them two licenses. One of each.

Use whichever is applicable.


2 posted on 04/26/2016 6:31:24 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

mahu’s are a dime a dozen in Hawaii , always have been . A perverse but long accepted part of the indigenous culture .

As they say here : no beeg ting . I see um every day - some are GIGANTIC ! weird .....


3 posted on 04/26/2016 6:31:59 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Does this mean that insurance is required to pay for sex change operations??


4 posted on 04/26/2016 6:32:07 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

This is all a bunch of garbage. They are trying to force us to accept their lifestyle. Discrimination isn’t the problem, forcing us to approve of their choices is the problem


5 posted on 04/26/2016 6:32:45 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The Insane putting the Insane above everyone else


8 posted on 04/26/2016 6:37:15 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The DemocRATS sure have a thing for sexual deviants. I guess it’s because that’s “who they are.”


11 posted on 04/26/2016 6:38:48 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (If SCOTUS is really so fair and unbiased, why is it a campaign issue about who is on it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I do not understand what this bill does. Does it require mammograms for a so-called “transgendered woman” (actually a guy) who does not have breasts, or does it mean that for medical care they must return to reality of their actual sex rather than follow a make believe “gender” written on their driver’s license?


12 posted on 04/26/2016 6:41:19 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Are these women really demanding screening for prostate cancer?


13 posted on 04/26/2016 6:41:37 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Kaleo Ramos, a transgender teacher, says people in Hawaii have been denied coverage for things like mammograms or screenings for prostate cancer because of the gender on their driver’s license

Ramos makes my point... you cant change gender. I man, dressed as a woman, identifies as a woman, but has a drivers license of man, is still a man. If transgenders existed, then one would change genders, but no one can change genders. A man dressed as a woman is only a transvestite and still needs to have his prostate checked.

14 posted on 04/26/2016 6:43:27 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
WTF? Have men been asking for mammograms and woemn for prostate screenings?

Then they get butthurt when logic kicks in when they are denied and told the request is insane? I live Hawaii and this is the first I have heard of this insanity.

15 posted on 04/26/2016 6:43:38 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

All this crap starts in Hawaii, jumps to California, then the Easy Coast, and finally the Supreme Court after infecting Middle America.


17 posted on 04/26/2016 6:45:44 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Kaleo Ramos, a transgender teacher, says people in Hawaii have been denied coverage for things like mammograms or screenings for prostate cancer because of the gender on their driver’s license. …

********************************************************

I bet they deny men hysterectomies too.

(Men can and do get breast cancer though)


18 posted on 04/26/2016 6:49:19 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

So I guess this covers OB GYN exams for Caitlin J. ?


21 posted on 04/26/2016 7:06:56 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (This household proudly voted for TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

So I guess we’re going to see a rise in death rates for testicular cancer when doctors have to pretend a guy is a gal and not notice what’s-a-danglin’ in front of him.


22 posted on 04/26/2016 7:17:24 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Crazy people forcing sane people to accept the insanity of other crazy people. The sane people must stop voting for the crazy people.


23 posted on 04/26/2016 7:45:17 PM PDT by TheDon (BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Oh Elvis, where are you when we need you: Return to Gender...
24 posted on 04/26/2016 10:36:58 PM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
people in Hawaii have been denied coverage for things like mammograms or screenings for prostate cancer because of the gender on their driver’s license

If this means mentally ill men who think they are women are denied prostate cancer screening, that is a problem. They have a prostate and should be screened (even if they are taking testosterone blockers that reduce their risk). If this means women who have modified their cosmetic appearance are being denied screenings for cancer in an organ they do not have, all sensible people would approve of that denial.

Mammograms are trickier. A male friend of mine died of breast cancer because no one thought to check for that condition. Unfortunately, male breast cancer is much harder to spot with implants in the way, which would be the case for mentally ill men who think they are women and have had cosmetic surgery to reinforce their delusions.

25 posted on 04/27/2016 1:18:06 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
“or limiting coverage based on a person’s

I can tell you from my professional experience that when an employer sends enrollment data to an insurance carrier, it contains information that includes age and gender.

That information is also linked to the insurer’s claim system. And for good reason.

Say a doctor’s office makes an honest mistake with a billing procedure code (CPT) (or is fraudulently padding bills or there is a case of a stolen SSN – identity theft), say a 14-year-old girl is billed for a prostate exam or a 14-year-old boy for a mammogram and a PAP smear, that will raise a red flag with the insurer and the claim will not be paid pending investigation, a correction in the billing code or a correction as to gender.

A while back we had an employee contact HR to inform us that his (obviously mentally ill) 15-year-old teenage daughter was “transgender”, was now “identifying as male” and submitted a name change for her - she had legally changed her given name from a female name to a male name.

But when the benefits manager put the change through that also included a change in gender in our HRIS system, as the HRIS manager who also deals with and solves errors with the EDI data exchanges to the insurance carriers, I rejected the change.

First of all, I asked the benefits manager if the girl had gone through and completed full gender reassignment surgery (sex change surgery) and she said no. I also asked if the girl had obtained a new BC. She said no. According to the benefits manager, all that happened was the girl had a legal change in name because she now “identified” as a male.

So I had to explain to her that if we put through the change in gender in our HRIS system, that would also pass over to the insurance company on the EDI file. And if that happened, since, despite how she now “identified”, she was still biologically female. So if she went to a GYN for either routine care or for a female problem, claims would most likely be rejected. The benefits manager and I contacted our medical insurance carrier and they agreed that her gender needed to stay female as to not cause claim issues.

Just because I say that my cat “identifies” as human, that doesn’t make my cat a human or allow me to claim it as a dependent on my tax return or add it to my medical insurance plan. If I “identify” as a cat, that doesn’t make me feline and I’m pretty sure it would be illegal for my cat’s veterinarian to treat me or give me rabies vaccines.

26 posted on 04/27/2016 2:57:26 AM PDT by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Now it will get as crazy as the UK, where an OBGYN was sued for not giving a transgender (crazy dude) a pap smear, despite the obvious - he doesn’t have a vagina or cervix.


27 posted on 04/27/2016 5:26:45 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

There are always untenable complications when you try to mock, repudiate and then artificially mimic reality. Anther issue has recently come to light, where a homosexual man and his “marriage” partner sued the insurance company to cover medical costs for woman who was acting as the surrogate “oven” for their “child.” The woman was obviously NOT related by marriage, blood, or familial ties, so the fags were on the hook for her expenses, which they claimed was “unequal.”

Yes, the “equality” meme is showing how false it really is.


29 posted on 04/27/2016 3:38:20 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson