Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottonBall

That could be it... Trump is trying to signal that this shouldn’t be considered a huge deal.

The problem is, I think it is a huge deal in terms of its subjective impact.

I’d say let Hillary try to stump for this. It will prove poison to her candidacy. In the meantime Trump can be all 10th Amendment about it, and will smell like a rose from a constitutional point of view. A president who sees a bigger role for the states is going to be welcome to constitutional aficionados.


52 posted on 04/25/2016 3:56:26 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Trump has to make clear that his SCOTUS judges will leave it to the states as they should, while Hillary’s judges would mandate trannies in the bathroom of their choosing nationwide under penalty by the federal bureau of transgender rights.


56 posted on 04/25/2016 4:02:33 PM PDT by JediJones (Looks like those clowns in Congress did it again. What a bunch of clowns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson