[eartick]

Why not replace Jackson with Reagan?

Why not leave it the hell alone? Why does the US mint have to spend our TAX money coming up with new ways to print the 20 or 10 or 5 dollar bills just to satisfy some PC revisionist?

I thought you tRump supporters did not believe in PCness?

Leave well enough alone and quit wasting my money.

[HiTech RedNeck]

I think the Tubman effort would make more sense. Because it would open up an opportunity to talk about an actual sore point in American history.

Blacks were enslaved. There is zero doubt about this. And it lasted after Abraham Lincoln, only with the old irons replaced with things that were more insidious. With shackles of lies that they had to be pets.

[DaveA37]

In reality does anyone really care who's picture is on the face of our currency? Does it really matter? What really matters is the actual value of the bill. As long as the value of say a $20.00 bill remains constant, the only picture I NEVER want to see would be odumbo’s picture.

[DaveA37]

In reality does anyone really care who's picture is on the face of our currency? Does it really matter? What really matters is the actual value of the bill. As long as the value of say a $20.00 bill remains constant, the only picture I NEVER want to see would be odumbo’s picture.

[DaveA37]

“Why not leave it the hell alone? “..........

I agree, changing it only costs us more money. It’s not broken so don’t fix it.

[GeorgiaDawg32]

Take a pill and calm down. All I’m simply saying is if they’re going to change it anyway, why not put Reagan on it instead of Tubman?

Conversely, leaving it alone is ok with me too.

I’m NOT an exclusive Trump supporter, ok? Get that through your head.

I’m ok with EITHER Trump or Cruz.

[Kaslin]

Good point.