Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salamander
In a perfect world, they’d be charged for the baby’s death.

Nah, irt was obviously negligent, but not criminal. It would serve no purpose to incarcerate anyone for this.

They could never be punished any more that what they'll have to endure for the rest of their lives.

And I assume the dog has been humanely destroyed...

60 posted on 04/22/2016 11:14:02 PM PDT by sargon (No king but Christ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: sargon

The dog is in quarantine, per the article.

I doubt anyone will bother to check him for tick born diseases, which can cause ‘sudden viciousness” and “hyper-re-activity” in afflicted dogs.

If I were not an adept dog owner, Odin would have ended up like two of his brothers, killed for “turning vicious”, when, in fact, they were no doubt severely hypothyroidal, like he is, as his dam was also hypo-T and thus, ALL the pups were affected.

[HypoT also cause dogs to suddenly “turn”, which he did, but less than hour later, he was at the vet, getting a thyroid panel run, instead of being killed or sent to the pound]

It is my opinion, that, if potential “pit bull” owners *knew* they would be held responsible for any and all damage done by their dogs, there would be far fewer incidents.

As it is, they “get justice” by killing the dumb animal while the dumb asses walk free.

And yes, I am a bit of a nut about personal responsibility.


62 posted on 04/22/2016 11:25:31 PM PDT by Salamander (We're pain, we're steel, a plot of knives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson