It doesn’t matter what the court thinks its doing. Illegal Aliens are going out like they came in and they can comeback legally, if they qualify. That will be done by executive order if necessary which is what this was-— So if it is upheld , Trump does his own executive order. Pretty simple stuff.
“During oral argument in the court this week, there was a bizarre exchange over terminology that the president used in his orders. In a weird series of questions, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. asked whether the president’s executive orders could be salvaged constitutionally by excising or changing a few words. This was improper because it treated an executive order as if it were a statute. It is not the job of the court to find ways to salvage executive orders as it is to salvage statutes, because the Constitution has given “all legislative Powers” to Congress and none to the president.”
We need to impeach and remove John Roberts from the SCOTUS!
What part of “illegal alien” don’t these people understand?
The US is a sovereign nation, and we owe mexico and the rest of central/south america approximately JACK/SHIT!
If it wasn’t for Polk, mexico would have been several more US states that we would have won from the spaniards.
If mexico and south america has a problem with tthis, we can always side with spain in their claim for ALL of central/south america, and let them take over. Think second coming of Cortez.
If we had an opposition party they would have been in court stopping his first illegal amnesty for illegal aliens in 2012 when he announced DACA.
As it is the states had to step usp to sue to stop his SECOND illegal amnesty for illegal aliens.
Presidents cannot change laws.
Kenyanesian Usurpers apparently can, though.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers…
States rights? CONgre$$? Who’da thunk it?
The most important question that was ever proposed to your decision, or to the decision of any people under heaven, is before you, and you are to decide upon it by men of your own election, chosen specially for this purpose. If the constitution, offered to your acceptance, be a wise one, calculated to preserve the invaluable blessings of liberty, to secure the inestimable rights of mankind, and promote human happiness, then, if you accept it, you will lay a lasting foundation of happiness for millions yet unborn; generations to come will rise up and call you blessed. You may rejoice in the prospects of this vast extended continent becoming filled with freemen, who will assert the dignity of human nature. You may solace yourselves with the idea, that society, in this favoured land, will fast advance to the highest point of perfection; the human mind will expand in knowledge and virtue, and the golden age be, in some measure, realised. But if, on the other hand, this form of government contains principles that will lead to the subversion of liberty — if it tends to establish a despotism, or, what is worse, a tyrannic aristocracy; then, if you adopt it, this only remaining assylum for liberty will be shut up, and posterity will execrate your memory.
Momentous then is the question you have to determine, and you are called upon by every motive which should influence a noble and virtuous mind, to examine it well, and to make up a wise judgment. It is insisted, indeed, that this constitution must be received, be it ever so imperfect. If it has its defects, it is said, they can be best amended when they are experienced. But remember, when the people once part with power, they can seldom or never resume it again but by force. Many instances can be produced in which the people have voluntarily increased the powers of their rulers; but few, if any, in which rulers have willingly abridged their authority. This is a sufficient reason to induce you to be careful, in the first instance, how you deposit the powers of government.
So far therefore as its powers reach, all ideas of confederation are given up and lost. It is true this government is limited to certain objects, or to speak more properly, some small degree of power is still left to the states, but a little attention to the powers vested in the general government, will convince every candid man, that if it is capable of being executed, all that is reserved for the individual states must very soon be annihilated, except so far as they are barely necessary to the organization of the general government. The powers of the general legislature extend to every case that is of the least importance — there is nothing valuable to human nature, nothing dear to freemen, but what is within its power. It has authority to make laws which will affect the lives, the liberty, and property of every man in the United States; nor can the constitution or laws of any state, in any way prevent or impede the full and complete execution of every power given. The legislative power is competent to lay taxes, duties, imposts, and excises; — there is no limitation to this power…
And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government. And if they may do it, it is pretty certain they will; for it will be found that the power retained by individual states, small as it is, will be a clog upon the wheels of the government of the United States; the latter therefore will be naturally inclined to remove it out of the way. Besides, it is a truth confirmed by the unerring experience of ages, that every man, and every body of men, invested with power, are ever disposed to increase it, and to acquire a superiority over every thing that stands in their way. This disposition, which is implanted in human nature, will operate in the federal legislature to lessen and ultimately to subvert the state authority, and having such advantages, will most certainly succeed, if the federal government succeeds at all.
In a free republic…
Brutus #1 - Anti-federalist
Separation of powers between the 3 branches or 3 stooges running kabuki theater on the citizens of the republic?
Step by step, inch by inch…(one day those rats came and destroyed everything)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYP1OBZfFK0
“Can Congress voluntarily give some of its powers to the president, either by legislation or by impotent acquiescence when the president takes them?
In a word, no. “
As the director says in Hollywood....
Cut! Take! Print! Lunch !
>>Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. asked whether the president’s executive orders could be salvaged constitutionally by excising or changing a few words.<<
The fix is in. Little Johnny Roberts is going to interpret the executive order as constitutional, just as he did with DeathCare. A tax is not a tax and a state exchange means a federal exchange.
And this is the finest legal mind in the country? I’d say close all he law schools, we’ve got idiots in plentiful supply. And I’d sue Roberts in criminal court for his adoptions.
POSOTUS, kangaroo Court, CONgreSS and the invasion.