Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ExTexasRedhead

“During oral argument in the court this week, there was a bizarre exchange over terminology that the president used in his orders. In a weird series of questions, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. asked whether the president’s executive orders could be salvaged constitutionally by excising or changing a few words. This was improper because it treated an executive order as if it were a statute. It is not the job of the court to find ways to salvage executive orders as it is to salvage statutes, because the Constitution has given “all legislative Powers” to Congress and none to the president.”

We need to impeach and remove John Roberts from the SCOTUS!


3 posted on 04/21/2016 9:31:21 AM PDT by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: vette6387

Sounds like the Dread Pirate Roberts is warming up for more pretzel logic to save the Kenyanesian Usurper again.


7 posted on 04/21/2016 9:37:06 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

Absolutely.

He has a history of egregiously impeachable behavior.


8 posted on 04/21/2016 9:37:41 AM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

Let John Obamacare Roberts write the executive orders. He’s a fixer.

TREASON - continuous, in-your-face, agenda-driven; agency-abetted, representative-enabled, judicially-accepted, media-complicit, ongoing...


12 posted on 04/21/2016 9:44:41 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson