To: Resolute Conservative
Could also be a reaction to the underwhelming F35.
4 posted on
04/20/2016 8:07:31 AM PDT by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: HombreSecreto
Hate on the F35 from a position of ignorance all you want.
But note, 2 different aircraft, 2 different missions.
8 posted on
04/20/2016 8:09:44 AM PDT by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
To: HombreSecreto
“Could also be a reaction to the underwhelming F35.”
That’s the ticket. It’ll probably be a whole lot LESS expensive to restart the F-22 line than to fix what is ailing the F35 - and there are lots of things in that latter category. The F35 smelled like over-priced boondoggle from Day 1.
15 posted on
04/20/2016 8:20:55 AM PDT by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
To: HombreSecreto
I wonder how many F22s we could have bought if we had just spent the money on F22s instead of developing and tooling for the F35.
23 posted on
04/20/2016 8:27:24 AM PDT by
conejo99
To: HombreSecreto
Could also be a reaction to the underwhelming F35.
The Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) F-35 is performing it's intended job as a follow on to the F-117 Nighthawk very nicely.
It will never be the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) that the F-22 is , nor was it ever intended to be.
Tons of money has been spent upgrading the Air to Air capability of the F-35 to justify canceling the F-22 but it will never be an F-22
However, much of the good stuff developed for F-35 will eventually find it's way into the F-22 and other aircraft as well.
32 posted on
04/20/2016 8:57:13 AM PDT by
rdcbn
("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Milleraere)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson