Posted on 04/19/2016 7:41:54 PM PDT by writer33
On the surface, President Obamas request for $1.9 billion dollars for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to fight the ZIKA virus seems pretty reasonable. Speaker Ryan has been holding up approval on that funding for a few months, and Democrats have pounced on him for it. What could Ryans objection be? Is he pro-epidemic?
In fact, what Ryan and many congressional Republicans are asking is pretty basic: use the money you already have first, and before we give you more money, tell us how you plan to use it. A brief look at the CDCs spending over the past 20 years quickly reveals why Congress is wise to be guarded about this latest funding request.
Like most government agencies, the CDC has displayed a tendency to take the Rahm Emmanuel approach of never letting a crisis go to waste. Particularly over the past couple decades, the Center has received major increases in funding to address individual disease scares (anthrax, bird flu, Ebola) that never seem to go away when the outbreak abates. As of fiscal year 2016, the CDCs budget stands at over $7 billion dollars, compared to under $3 billion in 2000.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com ...
No. They need DDT.
Amen.
Laws made in a hurried panic are cock full of unintended consequences.
local talk show guy built a bat house.
Spray the damn mosquitos to death.
In reality, their top guy said if they don't get the money, they'll have to take it from other programs.
Well guess what....that means you have excess funds stashed.
Indeed.
No. They need the dough to give themselves exorbitant pay raises and lucrative pensions and lavish parties.
Its already in a couple of homosexual couples. It won’t be long before its an epidemic as the disease amplifier sexual deviants will contribute greatly to its spread.
They need to fire the whole bunch of doctor impersonators at the CDC, NIH, and Surgeon General offices. They should have slapped travel restrictions on with quarantines for “VIPs” that were so important that they “needed” to travel to Brazil. They should have provided DDT “in kind” for them to take care of the problem in the first place. Don’t give these clowns another dime.
Why are there no stats on the number of affected people? Or pics of the thousands of deformed children?
Is it because there are none? Is this another Swine Flu scare?
DDT and a cap on spending. They have failed to do what their original intent was, yet they want more money to fulfill an impossible task. One must understand what a dollar sent to Washington D.C. means. It means nothing more than a job for a bureaucrat and getting 10 cents in return on services, if that. Abolish all agencies not specifically authorized by the Constitution. Freeze federal spending. An immediate 50% cut in all federal agencies would be a start.
I could go on but why? The “leader” bastards in office have no testicles, most of all Lyin’ Paul Ryan and Turtle Face Mitch McDumbo.
..... Well .... Ya ... Of course .... ..... You definitely wanna save the world doncha? Heck ..... Apparently ..... We also need another Trillion dollars to fight that horrible disease that is plaguing America right now called Conservatism!
..... Heck .... Liberals call it a mental disease ..... Just like we call Liberalism a mental disease. So I guess whoever controls the nations money at the end of this election will win the argument.
These “hurried panics” are used by shrewd people to squeeze money out for their own purposes; Newark NJ used terror funding to buy garbage trucks, and when exposed defended it by saying they might have to haul debris after an attack. In the end, it was just another way to funnel makers’ tax dollars into a takers’ fiscal black hole.
DDT, DDT, and more DDT.
May Rachel Carson enjoy whatever she is suffering for her evil.
nope, they just want to purchase more ammo so as to keep it our of the hands of citizens.
They still have to buy the DDT.
CDC knows all that you have to do to have more money to a government cause or agencey is to scare the hell out of ignorant women and timid men. That’s all! They will go for anything that scares them even if it will do nothing for them. It’s makes them feel SAFE!
Hey, don’t mock the bat house. The amount of mosquitoes a single bat consumes daily is amazing. We need them. Get better PR for bats. I’ve seen their numbers decrease over the last few years near an Upstate lake. Not good.
Meanwhile, while we wait for bat numbers to increase, yes, bring back DDT.
The amount of mosquitoes a single bat consumes daily is amazing. >>>> that’s great. do you call them in on the bat phone? skeeters ar 4:00 high. just kidding and i wasn’t mocking just think it is funny,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.