Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/19/2016 12:56:55 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Wonder who arranged the clusterf*ck??? Hmmmmmmmmmm.....


2 posted on 04/19/2016 1:00:48 PM PDT by JBW1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s no thread for percentages in.


4 posted on 04/19/2016 1:05:57 PM PDT by wastedyears (I identify as an A-10 Warthog and am attracted to tanks. If you don't agree, you're otherkin phobic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Is it only Democrats who are having trouble voting?


5 posted on 04/19/2016 1:10:51 PM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Even worse, what about all those residents who aren’t active voters, but would very likely vote in this particular election given the increased turnout seen in other states? They’re iced out as well.

Hard to be sympathetic to the willfully ignorant.

6 posted on 04/19/2016 1:10:55 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What NY is running is a very fair process. I don’t like the situations where party members don’t have primaries to vote for candidates. Open primaries are an equally bad idea, at the other extreme. It seems totally reasonable that a person should have to be a member of a political party a month (or more) before the primary. That way, the party has time to make sure every party member has equal access to information about how delegate selection will be done. Another benefit is there can’t be any mischief such as “vote for the worst” or what happened to steal that nomination for Cochran.


7 posted on 04/19/2016 1:19:49 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

——They’re iced out as well.——

well, no

they chose not to be involved in the primary process

they are independents

the process is difficult to weed out the riff raff


12 posted on 04/19/2016 1:33:05 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (leading from behind is following)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh, the horror, you actually have to be registered in a political party to decide that party’s nominee!

Heck, why even require U.S. citizenship to vote in the election? U.S. policy affects other countries, right, so just let everybody vote! Let them do it by e-mail from Zimbabwe if they want to.

Why should you even be limited to vote in only one primary for that matter? Everyone should get to vote in both the Democrat and Republican primaries. And you should get to vote in all 50 states too. It’s demoCRAZY!


13 posted on 04/19/2016 1:34:22 PM PDT by JediJones (Looks like those clowns in Congress did it again. What a bunch of clowns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama and the Democrats/Republicans in Congress have set the tone for law enforcement and discipline in the country. The “new tone” is one of slackness, blatant lawlessness, and no accountability.


15 posted on 04/19/2016 1:40:14 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I think that the premise of this article is bogus. Political Parties can select their party nominee in any number of ways, subject to certain rules about gaining to each state’s ballot and certification that the nominee is qualified for the Office of the President. No one has a right to vote for a party nominee, although a state political party may choose to hold a primary election, and then may choose how to conduct the election subject to state laws.

Recall that Ross Perot run as an Independent in 1992 and used a grass roots organization to get his name on the ballot in all 50 states. There were no primaries. In 1995, Perot formed the Reform Party, but they did not have a convention, and they held a primary based on mailed ballots to those who had qualified as members of the Reform Party. Perot was nominated and once again, he qualified for the ballot on all 50 states, although in some states, he had to file as an Independent.

We tolerate this government/political party conspiracy for the purposes of having a state wide primary, but it’s not required and voters really don’t have any rights to participate in the process. Interestingly, everyone used to understand that the primaries were really just “beauty contests” that did not bind the parties or the delegates to their convention. We now have a later generation who believe that they have a right to vote for the candidate of their choice in a primary and that their political party is obligated to nominate whomever the primary voters selected. That has always been a fiction, but was encouraged by the parties who wanted to present unity to the TV audience at the national conventions. Of course, the real outcome has been to plant a false expectation among voters, decimate the TV ratings, and reduce the powers of the political parties. The liberals and the media have be the beneficiaries of this evolution of our election process.


19 posted on 04/19/2016 2:07:43 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What’s the problem? It’s a closed primary. In NYC, to vote you have to choose a party when you register. If your party is not running a candidate, you don’t get to vote. I switched my party to vote for Guiliani - I had been a registered Democrat simply to vote for the less left-wing mayoral candidates during primary season (Ed Koch, that means you). When Guiliani ran, I switched my party affiliation. Now, I’m going to have to switch back from I to R so I can vote for Trump in the primary in NJ.


20 posted on 04/19/2016 2:07:44 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Lyin’ Ted must be up to his old tricks again


24 posted on 04/19/2016 2:51:59 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Strange hours but it’s their choice......

Primary Elections
In New York City and the counties of Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam and Erie,
POLLS OPEN AT 6 AM - CLOSE AT 9 PM.

In all other counties,
POLLS OPEN AT 12 NOON and CLOSE AT 9 PM.

General Election
POLLS OPEN AT 6 AM - CLOSE AT 9 PM
http://www.elections.ny.gov/FAQ.html


32 posted on 04/19/2016 3:22:50 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
New York has one of the most archaic primaries in the nation. Not only is it one of only 11 states with closed primaries,

no.... that's the way it's supposed to be stooopid!!! i don't want RATS having a say as to who my candidate is

35 posted on 04/19/2016 4:16:17 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson