(from the article):" ..part of a group at EPA that made up their minds that this project should be vetoed before any of the science that they alleged they did was done."
Obviously the science is in , and it is unquestionable - must be mine-denier !
and then they did the science.., sorta like "global warming" , which became "climate change" !
they decided against this mine for one reason only....the higher ups are protecting some other company or competition....
that's the rat way....quid pro quo...