[Lurkinanloomin]

I’m sure you were perfectly happy with the “peoples choice” of McCain and Romney.
We can now see clearly how they have managed to nominate such Designated Losers.

[Scutter]

I’m sure you were perfectly happy with the “peoples choice” of McCain and Romney. We can now see clearly how they have managed to nominate such Designated Losers.

Thank you for so quickly and effectively providing an additional example of exactly the kind of post to which I was referring: Completely avoiding all of the points in the original post and instead resorting to unfounded assertions and personal attacks.

So first off, no, I was not "perfectly happy" with the McCain or Romney as candidate.

Second, I reject your's and other's repeated attempts to associate anything not-Donald as pro-establishment. This primary season the Republican party was WELL on the way to electing a non-establishment candidate, and I think this would have happened with considerably less drama had Trump not entered the race. What has happened since Trump entered the race, and I don't lay blame for this entirely at Trump's feet, is that the race has become a complete circus, virtually guaranteeing that Hillary will be our next President.