I’m sure you were perfectly happy with the “peoples choice” of McCain and Romney. We can now see clearly how they have managed to nominate such Designated Losers.Thank you for so quickly and effectively providing an additional example of exactly the kind of post to which I was referring: Completely avoiding all of the points in the original post and instead resorting to unfounded assertions and personal attacks.
So first off, no, I was not "perfectly happy" with the McCain or Romney as candidate.
Second, I reject your's and other's repeated attempts to associate anything not-Donald as pro-establishment. This primary season the Republican party was WELL on the way to electing a non-establishment candidate, and I think this would have happened with considerably less drama had Trump not entered the race. What has happened since Trump entered the race, and I don't lay blame for this entirely at Trump's feet, is that the race has become a complete circus, virtually guaranteeing that Hillary will be our next President.
Except that Cruz is not anti-establishment, he just acts like he is, then he votes for Corker, TPA and won’t say anything about enforcement of immigration laws until recently.
His answer a year ago was that we would have a conversation about the 30 million illegal aliens already here after the border was secure. Sounds suspiciously like McCain/Grahma/Yeb!/and the rest of the Cheap Labor Express traitors.
I think anyone would have to concede that the GOP was NOT on the way to picking an “outsider” before Trump entered the race, and that we all, including Ted Cruz, owe Trump a debt of gratitude for not allowing the GOPe to serve up a Jeb Bush candidacy and manufacture a Clinton-Bush re-run to bring back those neocon glory days of the 1990’s