Isn't this in violation of the equal protection clause of the constitution? How can 2 courts, one for poor one for wealthy be legal?
1 posted on
04/17/2016 1:41:24 PM PDT by
rey
To: rey
If you can’t pay a $500 driving fine, you probably aren’t paying for insurance.
2 posted on
04/17/2016 1:45:30 PM PDT by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: rey
Not only that....but Sonoma County needs a court dealing with illegal immigrants.....deport or work for Sheriff Joe building the WALL....
Oh Noes.....Sonoma is a sanctuary county...
3 posted on
04/17/2016 1:48:01 PM PDT by
spokeshave
(Somewhere there is a ceiling for Trump.....Yeah, it's called The Oval Office)
To: rey
Then financial disaster struck. No, disregard for the LAW struck. Vet or not, homeless or not. If I'm homeless and struggling to make ends meet I don't go around breaking laws that are easy to avoid.
Releasing them from the responsibilities of society is no way to "re-integrate" them.
6 posted on
04/17/2016 1:52:28 PM PDT by
Feckless
(The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
To: rey
With our so called “courts” already a joke and a clown show, what we needed was a bunch of “designer” courts in which some people are more “equal” than others. If you work and have money, the bastards want it. If you’re “homeless”, you get a free pass. When America was a fair and equal country, this kind of liberal, commie BS would have been ruled unconstitutional.
8 posted on
04/17/2016 2:36:14 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(The "college" snowflakes need to check their American privilege. Everything isn't a right.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson