Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The (Jerk) Boss: Springsteen
Politichicks ^ | 4/12/2016 | Steven Maikoski

Posted on 04/12/2016 7:44:09 AM PDT by Loud Mime

When Bruce Springsteen cancelled his concert in North Carolina this month because of politics, I thought “what a jerk.” He wanted to send a message, and he wasn’t concerned that his cancellation affected far more people than the issue he claimed to be protesting. It was about a new law in the state which restricted men’s bathrooms to males, and women’s bathrooms to females. My god, the nerve of those Carolinians!

The “Boss,” or some PR flake of his, explained: “To my mind, it’s an attempt by people who cannot stand the progress our country has made in recognizing the human rights of all of our citizens to overturn that progress.”

It is an misleading statement on so many levels—but it is one that defines the liberal mind so well. I will start with my favorite issue of the liberal faction: their claiming various rights that are not in the Constitution—while ignoring (or abdicating through unhinged courts) ratified, solid constitutional rights that are still on the books.

Let us step back in history. The convention of 1787 provided a Constitution that did not have a bill of rights. Some of our founding fathers wanted it that way, believing that their new design of government would stay “limited” on its own.Their optimism was due to the citizens of that day, who were educated enough to understand government abuse and fought it—instead of embracing it, like most of the voters today.

So in the debates leading to ratification, within Federalist #84, Alexander Hamilton penned:

“I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted." [ emphasis mine ]

Springsteen is doing exactly what Hamilton warned of: claiming rights that were not granted by our Constitution. At the same time he is reducing those believers of traditional family values to persons who “cannot stand the progress our country has made.”

The “progress” he alludes to is the gains that homosexuals, transgenders, lesbians and bisexuals have made in accessing the children of traditional families. Why is Springsteen taking this path? Has the rock & roll lifestyle given him experiences that has brought him to favor these characters over the traditional roles? Darned if I know; but I do know that actions speak louder than words. Party on, Bruce!

Actually, Springsteen’s protest is in line with his politics. He’s a supporter of our current president, the one who lit the White House in rainbow colored celebration of a SCOTUS decision; and the list of Springsteen’s promoting gay powers (not “rights,” mind you) yields a google search consisting of many pages. That is Bruce and his desires. But the downside of Springsteen’s views is his intolerance of those who disagree with him. He shares this intolerance of conservative views with all liberals.

For years I have written about the typical liberal mindset as “intolerance masquerading as tolerance.” A disagreement with a liberal means engaging in a political dialogue where logic is absent. They debate with half-truths and mischaracterizations. They change words to avoid a direct reference to the truth. Homosexual has been changed to “gay.” If you disagree with them, they claim that you have an irrational fear of their opinions, that you have a phobia, instead of the actual disagreement. Then we have their “stupid” or “racist” cards that are thrown out when they’re losing the argument.

Their stubbornness is designed to avoid socratic discourse, so the party survives despite all the evidence against it.

Liberalism is pro-family. But liberalism is pro-political family, not traditional family. Traditional values hold that you do not subject your children to the horrible debt that is necessary for the preservation of today’s liberalism. Today’s liberal cult is waging a horrible act of fiscal child abuse (another of my favorite terms) on our future generations, without caring about them. Hey, kid! I’ll be dead before you have to pay MY bills! It works for me!

Remember, the liberal faction re-elected a president who has now doubled our national debt in just six years. It is important to acknowledge that despite the words and excuses that are endlessly tendered by the liberal faction, actions speak louder than words. Their political family cannot survive without running the nation into horrible debt.

This is Bruce Springsteen’s family.

I must confess that I liked Springsteen’s earlier works, the ones he made before he started using reverb. I still listen to The Wild, the Innocent and the E-Street Shuffle and the Asbury Park albums. Back then he was a true artist; he has since changed to an entertainer. He brings in the bucks and people make money from his concerts, when he allows it. Good for you, Bruce. But I believe that family comes first.

Meanwhile, there is an answer to the public bathroom dilemma. A couple of years ago I dined at a restaurant in downtown Phoenix. Each toilet was in a small, separate room—with no gender assigned. In each room was a mirror, for primping and inspection. But the coolest feature of this design was that the wash basins were on the outside of the rooms, where everybody in the restaurant could see if you washed your hands or not. As a result, the restaurant’s patrons have clean hands and the children are safe.

The restroom design is a good idea that bypasses the attorneys and the liberal faction’s protesters. It’s so good that you may see this design in every town where Bruce holds his concerts.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bathroombill; brucespringsteen; intolerance; northcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: kevcol

Ping!


41 posted on 04/12/2016 10:19:52 AM PDT by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

Did you read the last two paragraphs of the article?


42 posted on 04/12/2016 10:28:52 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Liberalism: Intolerance masquerading as tolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

With all the problems we are facing, including open borders and the importation of dangerous Syrians and Somalis, Springsteen gets hysterical over a state’s laws regarding public restrooms.


43 posted on 04/12/2016 10:32:58 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TheCause

44 posted on 04/12/2016 10:46:56 AM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: edh

In June, 1970, my future wife and I attended her senior prom for Rumson-Fair Haven Rehional High School in N.J. The band the prom committee hired for the event had the most annoying “singer” I’d ever heard. He looked about twelve years old and spent the entire night literally screeching into the microphone. Everyone in attendance kept asking “Who is this little jerk?” Years later we learned it was none other than The Boss himself.

After marrying four years later, we bought our first house in Rumson, NJ. where she had lived before we were married. In our neighborhood of converted summer bungalows, we joked that we lived in “Rumson’s ghetto.” A few years later, Springsteen bought his Rumson estate, a dignified old mansion, on a large, park-like corner lot in town. It was very common to see him in the local stores and he was very pleasant. My favorite memory of him is the night he and Bon Jovi (another Jersey boy) attended and sang at a girl’s sweet sixteen birthday thrown by her father at his spread in Rumson. Can you imagine what that must have set the father back? Two years later, the same starry-eyed girl was arrested by NYC undercover cops after she tried to sell them drugs. Of course she got off with a slap on the wrist.

The point is that while Springsteen started out as a true “working class” guy, like any one else probably would have, he succumbed to the lifestyle of the rich and famous while adapting their clownish political ideas to cement his membership in “the club.”


45 posted on 04/12/2016 11:13:47 AM PDT by clive bitterman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

IF and when open bathroom season comes to my state, I will be plotting to spend some time in random ladies’ rooms. Stand at the mirror, apply lipstick to my outwardly (and inwardly) male persona, for hours in a non-threatening but yet disturbing way, with purpose of freaking out those who enter.

Some legal insurrection will motivate some vocal moms to get busy with their legislators and get the madness fixed.

Rosa Parks in the front of the bus ain’t nothing compared to a rash of freaky 50-something males in the ladies rooms.


46 posted on 04/12/2016 11:49:27 AM PDT by spiderpig (does whatever a SpiderPig does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spiderpig

Rosa Parks in the front of the bus ain’t nothing compared to a rash of freaky 50-something males in the ladies rooms.


Very good point!


47 posted on 04/12/2016 1:54:49 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Liberalism: Intolerance masquerading as tolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Yes, I did, but it is not a good idea for the sexes to use the same facilities. What is to prevent a male from being in the stall waiting for an unsuspecting woman to come in? In a sane world, nobody walks through the main door into the restroom except those who belong there. The 2 areas are completely separate, as they should be.


48 posted on 04/13/2016 7:49:54 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson