Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in N.J. resulting from charges of ballot access fraud
gloucestercitynews.net ^

Posted on 04/10/2016 8:21:55 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in New Jersey resulting from charges of ballot access fraud. A primary ballot disqualification hearing is scheduled by the Secretary of State for Monday, April 11 at 9:00 a.m. in Mercerville, New Jersey.

Washington D.C. Law Professor Victor Williams charges that Ted Cruz fraudulently certified his constitutional eligibility for office to gain ballot access. Williams demands that Cruz be disqualified from several late-primary ballots: "Cruz committed ballot access fraud in each state when he falsely swore that he was a 'natural born' American citizen." Cruz was born in Calgary, Canada and held his resulting Canadian citizenship until May 2014. Cruz is a naturalized (not natural born) American citizen.

Williams' fraud charges had quick effect in New Jersey. Rather than accepting Cruz's ballot petition when filed last week, the Secretary of State ( Kim Guadagno) scheduled the unusual Administrative Law hearing for April 11. The Canadian-born Cruz must prove that he did not falsely certify his eligibility for office.

Cruz's ballot eligibility is also being challenged in California, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington.

(Excerpt) Read more at gloucestercitynews.net ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; birther; birtherredux; canadian; cruz; cruzie; cruzisobama2; delusionaldrones; globalistcruz; incestuousted; ineligible; lyinted; naturalborncitizen; newjersey; nj; noteligiblecruz; openboarderscruz; repositorycruz; stopthesteal; tdsincoming; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 721-734 next last
To: Moseley; onyx; Jane Long; miss marmelstein; 20yearsofinternet; tirednvirginia; PJBankard; ...
“Until Cruz unseals his records “

There are no sealed records.
You, sir, are a damnable liar, I say again, sir.
No Ted Cruz records have been sealed.


ESAD TROLL.

Time for you to hibernate for another 4 months.
561 posted on 04/11/2016 10:56:20 AM PDT by mkjessup (We Don't Know. Where Heidi Went. But She Won't Be Married. To The President. Burma Shave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

“You know Citizenship is verified by your birth certificate “

A birth certificate is ONE WAY to prove citizenship.

A birth certificate is evidence of citizenship.

Ted Cruz has a birth certificate showing that his mother was a US citizen at his birth — which makes him a US citizen at birth under 14 USC 1401(g).

Imagine, as I keep posting, survivalists go up into the mountains and live off the land. They have a child. 40 years later their 35 year old son comes down from the hills and decides to run for president.

Is he a natural born citizen? Absolutely.

Does he have a birth certificate? No.


562 posted on 04/11/2016 10:56:28 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

No other loyalties was the inception of the term “natural born citizen.” Read John Jay’s letter! John Jay was to become the FIRST CHIEF JUSTICE of the Supreme Court. George Washington passed on Jay’s suggestion to the Framers of the Constitution.

John Jay wrote a letter to General Washington, the President of the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention ...

“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a
natural born Citizen.”

General Washington handed the suggestion to the framers and the rest is history. As we are talking original intent, no “weight of legal and historical authority” is required to get this far. This is about “foreigners”.


563 posted on 04/11/2016 10:56:43 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Moseley; onyx; Jane Long; miss marmelstein; 20yearsofinternet; tirednvirginia; PJBankard; ...
There are no sealed records to be unsealed.
You are caught up in a fantasy world


So are you. You thought you would raise $3000 on a fundraising website and all you got was $50.

You better chase some more ambulances.
564 posted on 04/11/2016 10:58:09 AM PDT by mkjessup (We Don't Know. Where Heidi Went. But She Won't Be Married. To The President. Burma Shave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Google is your friend, https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ted+cruz+sealed+records


565 posted on 04/11/2016 10:58:50 AM PDT by stockpirate (Rush is a low information talk show host concerning Ted sCruz and Marco foamboy Rubio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

What idiots.

NOTICE what they quote:

“A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met. The child’s parents

SHOULD

contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America (CRBA) to document that the child is a U.S. citizen. If the U.S. embassy or consulate determines that the child acquired U.S. citizenship at birth, a consular officer will approve the CRBA application and the Department of State will issue a CRBA, also called a Form FS-240, in the child’s name.”

SHOULD — but don’t have to.


566 posted on 04/11/2016 10:59:46 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

” A natural born citizen is one born of both parents citizens AND born on the soil of the U.S. A Natural born citizen can be no other citizen by birth but American.”

Where is that in the Constitution?


567 posted on 04/11/2016 11:00:14 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
He might have been or he might not have been, I think that is why he didn't make POTUS, there was doubt, the same as with Cruz....

The framers put it so they were ‘naturalized’ citizens, so when their children were born they would be, ‘Natural Born Citizens’, the framers were not born here...they came from England...

The 14th amendment was to give the slaves, after their freedom, ‘naturalized’ citizens so their children born here could be ‘Natural Born Citizens’....born on American Soil...

Also, when a man marries a woman, the woman takes the last name of the man, whether she uses it or not, she still is Mrs. So and So....the children from that marriage takes on the name of the Father, so in order for Cruz to be Cruz, his father would have had to be born on American Soil, to give him that right, it does not come from the mother, it passes from the father...

Cruz is saying he got his citizenship from his mother, then why isn't his last name Darrugh or Wilson? Why is it Cruz? See how that works...he's lying...

568 posted on 04/11/2016 11:00:44 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

“The 14th amendment was to give the slaves, after their freedom, ‘naturalized’ citizens so their children born here could be ‘Natural Born Citizens’....born on American Soil...”

It does not matter WHY something was put in the Constitution.

The only thing that counts is what the Constitution SAYS.

Why doesn’t count.

Why means nothing.


569 posted on 04/11/2016 11:02:00 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

“Cruz is saying he got his citizenship from his mother, then why isn’t his last name Darrugh or Wilson? Why is it Cruz? See how that works...”

No, that’s not how it works.

Parenthood and citizenship are not the same thing.


570 posted on 04/11/2016 11:02:48 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

“Cruz and his surrogates attacked Trump’s wife first, Trump truth.”

Another lie.


571 posted on 04/11/2016 11:03:16 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

I have read it all, going back to 2014.


572 posted on 04/11/2016 11:03:47 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

“You are out to liberalville. There is NO authority given to Congress or any court to give or take ‘natural born’ US citizenship. NONE:”

Yes there is.

Whenever a term is not defined, it is a delegation to Congress to define the term.

Same thing happens when Congress writes statutes. It is clearly the power of the executive branch agency to define unclear terms or clear up uncertainty in the statute.

Because the Constitution does not define the term “natural born citizen” it is the Congress’ power AND DUTY to define the term.

Congress has done so since 1790.

Congress has the power to define who is a natural born citizen.

You cannot accept the fact that natural born citizen is NOT defined in the Constitution.


573 posted on 04/11/2016 11:06:30 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Then you agree because you said ‘Parenthood and citizenship are not the same thing’ is that Cruz is not edible to be POTUS because he was not ‘Born on American Soil’....thank you!!!
574 posted on 04/11/2016 11:06:41 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

“So are you. You thought you would raise $3000 on a fundraising website and all you got was $50. “

No I didn’t think or expect I would raise anything.

As I stated there, I said I cannot take the time away from other work to do a brief UNLESS the money I would lose is compensated.

So, I wasn’t going to spend any time on it unless some donors wanted to step up.

You really can’t keep your eye on the ball, right?


575 posted on 04/11/2016 11:08:42 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

“Read John Jay’s letter! John Jay was to become the FIRST CHIEF JUSTICE of the Supreme Court. George Washington passed on Jay’s suggestion to the Framers of the Constitution.”

And where did John Jay DEFINE who is a “natural born citizen?”

Answer: He did not.

In response to John Jay’s letter, the Constitutional Convention required that a president must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years (out of 35 years minimum to be President).


576 posted on 04/11/2016 11:10:30 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

How do you figure that?


577 posted on 04/11/2016 11:10:53 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Bookmark to read later


578 posted on 04/11/2016 11:12:56 AM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

“You have NO right to mess with ‘original intent’. GET over yourself. “

The original intent of the Constitutional Convention tracks the two dominant influences on the founders:

1) THE BIBLE
2) Precedent from British common law.

1) THE BIBLE: Citizenship follows the parents, not the place of birth.

Children born in Egypt to Israelite parents were ISRAELITES — not Egyptians.

Children born in Babylon, Assyria, Rome, etc. to Israelite parents were ISRAELITES.

The overwhelmingly dominant influence on the American Founding makes the place of birth irrelevant and the parents of the child EVERYTHING in deciding citizenship.

2) English common law. As much as 100 years before the founding of America, the British parliament was using the power of naturalization to define who is a natural born subject, and specifying that children born in foreign lands to British subjects are natural born subjects of the UK


579 posted on 04/11/2016 11:14:13 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Yes there is. Whenever a term is not defined, it is a delegation to Congress to define the term. Same thing happens when Congress writes statutes. It is clearly the power of the executive branch agency to define unclear terms or clear up uncertainty in the statute. Because the Constitution does not define the term “natural born citizen” it is the Congress’ power AND DUTY to define the term. Congress has done so since 1790. Congress has the power to define who is a natural born citizen. You cannot accept the fact that natural born citizen is NOT defined in the Constitution.

The Framers knew darn well what 'natural born' meant... and so do I. What you are ignoring is the history of how the Framers came up with the requirement of 'natural born'. They used it specifically as required qualification to hold the office of president. They NEVER allow any authority to redefine its original meaning.

Trump is the one who forced the Obama crew to produce a born in the USA birth certificate for Obama... Nobody is ever going to produce a born in the USA birth certificate for Ted Cruz.

Ah what you are attempting to do is to 're-define' the meaning of 'natural born'.

580 posted on 04/11/2016 11:15:33 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 721-734 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson