Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Suz in AZ

lol

wow the stupidity is strong with this one!

I thought the birthers had given up and tucked their tails and hid from their own stupidity !


5 posted on 04/07/2016 3:35:21 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasFreeper2009

LOL I am not into all this , but I am damn sure you was a so called birther back a couple of years ago about fairy boy.


10 posted on 04/07/2016 3:38:04 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

You do know that the “birther” label is party of Alinsky tactics to silence the opposition don’t you? I wouldn’t expect any kind of conservative to jump on that bandwagon.


11 posted on 04/07/2016 3:38:49 PM PDT by Kenny (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

No, we “birthers” foolishly believe in the US Constitution, and that Article I, Section II, Clause 5 means what it says it means, and that it defines who may hold the office of president. We foolishly believe that merely being natural born does not negate 1,2,5, but that 1, 2, 5 sets up additional requirements for the presidency; that not only must the candidate be natural born, he/she must have two US citizen parents, be born on American soil, be 35 years of age, and at least 14 years of residency in the US.

We also believe that redefining “natural born” means any person in the world with even the most tenuous connection to US Citizenship bodes ill for the future, and threatens our national sovreignty, our constitution, and our freedom.

It would be considerate of you to respect our objections, address our concerns as to why article II should be ignored, and just how, after 250 years, it has suddenly become so unimportant. It would be courteous, if nothing else, to not so dismissive, insulting, and rude.

Silly us, for thinking our fellow Americans would show any respect us for taking the constitution seriously, or even listen to what we have to say about why we think every article, every clause, every amendment matters.

On further reflection, perhaps someday soon, when for whatever reason, there is another assault on the constitution, the 1st amendment perhaps, we who think it means freedom of speech and should be followed, will sneeringly to told the stupid is strong with us, and we will be called “speechers” or “righters,” as our constitution continues to be degraded.

I am glad I am old. I am glad for most of life I was not told the stupid was strong with me because I learned as a school child what the constitution stood for, and I understood it. That things were perverse in those days, you could believe that the constitution actually said what it said.


121 posted on 04/07/2016 9:00:40 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson