Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s Religious Liberty vs. Gay Sharia in Dixie
The Stream ^ | 4/6/16 | John Zmirak

Posted on 04/06/2016 4:15:37 PM PDT by markomalley

Ever since Walmart pressured Arkansas to reject civil rights protections for Christians, and the #BoycottIndiana movement roped in huge companies like Apple, there’s been a confrontation brewing between Americans who demand the free exercise of religion, and big business lobbyists who want to keep their gay customers and stockholders happy. We saw it in Georgia recently, and now PayPal is getting in on the act in North Carolina.

The question is whether politically active Christians can motivate churchgoers and other fans of the First Amendment to counteract high-dollar blackmail of the sort the NFL and Disney employed to cow the governor of Georgia into vetoing a religious liberty bill in his state.

Will Christian business owners, and in some cases Christian clergy, be able to follow their consciences in refusing to participate in same-sex “marriages?” Will state and local governments enforce on every citizen the dictates of “transgender” theory, allowing full-grown, biologically intact men who claim to “identify” as women access to women’s bathrooms and locker rooms, among other absurdities?

One implication no one is talking about, but which you can count on gay radicals running with, is this: What about denominations that only ordain male clergy? Could biologically female students assert that they “identify” as male, and demand enrollment in Catholic, Orthodox and orthodox Jewish seminaries? Obama’s solicitor general already admitted during the arguments leading up to the Supreme Court’s gay marriage decision that he foresaw yanking the non-profit status of Christian ministries and schools, churches and cathedrals that won’t perform same-sex marriages. Why would government officials who are willing to persecute Christian bakers over a wedding cake, and drive the Catholic Church and the Southern Baptist Convention into tax bankruptcy, blanch at monkeying with seminary admissions to “protect” the “civil rights” of confused women who aspire to be ordained as male priests or rabbis? (We can be morally certain that Islamic institutions will forever remain mysteriously exempt.)

A Courageous Few

In North Carolina, Gov. Pat McCrory signed a bill overriding a local, Charlotte, N.C., law that would have let people who psychically identify with the opposite sex use the bathroom of their choice. The result has been a savage backlash, with other state governments suspending official travel to North Carolina, federal agencies threatening to cut off millions in federal funding, and now a concerted effort by big business to cripple the state’s economy.

The Washington Post reports that the latest bully to join the attack is online broker Paypal. The Post reports that the company “is abandoning plans to expand into Charlotte in response to the legislation.” The story continues:

This decision came just weeks after PayPal, the California-based online payments firm spun off from eBay, said it would open a global operations center in Charlotte, a move that state officials said would bring millions to the local economy and employ 400 people.

“The new law perpetuates discrimination and it violates the values and principles that are at the core of PayPal’s mission and culture,” Dan Schulman, PayPal’s president and chief executive, wrote in a statement on Tuesday. “As a result, PayPal will not move forward with our planned expansion into Charlotte.”

… The state law was quickly pilloried by LGBT rights groups and a host of companies, including Apple, Google, American Airlines and Lowe’s. The NBA, which has a franchise in Charlotte, suggested that it was considering moving next season’s All-Star game out of that city because of the law.

The State of Mississippi is also standing up for the religious rights of its citizens to free exercise of their faith. On April 5, Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant defied big business pressure and signed into law HB 1523, the “Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act.” Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said:

This new law gives fresh momentum to efforts on the federal and state level to stop government discrimination against people who believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. We applaud Governor Bryant, Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves, and House Speaker Philip Gunn, for standing up for the fundamental freedoms of the people they represent. No person should be punished by the government with crippling fines, or face disqualification for simply believing what President Obama believed just a few years ago, that marriage is the union of a man and a woman.

Big business and Hollywood have engaged in economic blackmail in Mississippi just like they have in Indiana, Georgia, North Carolina and Texas to try to force government discrimination of those who support natural marriage. However, unlike Indiana and Georgia, leaders in Mississippi, North Carolina and Texas have chosen to defend the fundamental freedom of their citizens to believe and live according to those beliefs, rather than capitulate to the economic threats of big business and entertainment.

Perkins suggests that in many cases standing up to the bullies is not only the right thing to do but also the political savvy thing. “Long-term, political leaders who refuse to sacrifice fundamental freedoms under the threats of big government, big business and big entertainment are rewarded with support of voters as their states find such policies promote stronger families, stronger communities, which lead to stronger economies,” he said.

In support of that argument, the Family Research Council cited “a poll released on Friday shows nearly two-thirds of Mississippi voters want to protect pastors, churches, schools, and businesses from government discrimination.”

Texas Senator Ted Cruz, currently  battling Donald Trump and Gov. John Kasich for delegates in Wisconsin, is a longtime supporter of legislation protecting religious freedom. Cruz said in 2015, in the wake of the Indiana debacle: “I can tell you this, when it comes to standing for the religious liberty of Americans, I will always, always, always stand with the First Amendment.”


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: dixie; homosexualagenda; religiousliberty

1 posted on 04/06/2016 4:15:37 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

PayPal dos business in 25 countries where homosexual behavior is criminal. They have no problem doing business in Saudi Arabia where the penalty is death.

L


2 posted on 04/06/2016 4:18:35 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I live in Georgia. Who ever thought we would be looking up to Mississippi to lead the way for liberty and personal freedoms.


3 posted on 04/06/2016 4:21:43 PM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Companies that promote homosexuality need to be barred from doing business in all Muslim countries. All Muslim Countries need to outlaw any business that promotes Homosexuality.

We can do our part by helping to inform the Muslim countries that certain businesses support Homosexuality.

Many hundreds of billions in losses to these companies might wake them up to their folly.

4 posted on 04/06/2016 4:22:43 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I worry the Muslims will try to gain "religious freedoms" and push their Sharia laws on States and communities. What's good for the goose...
5 posted on 04/06/2016 4:24:44 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg505

The wording in the vetoed bill would have allowed Muslims to not serve Christians, allowed Muslims to be disruptive as workers and other nasty unintended consequences. It should have been vetoed


6 posted on 04/06/2016 4:36:39 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You don’t understand. Liberalism and Islamism have joined forces to oust Christianity and destroy Western civilization. That’s why Apple and these other companies don’t have a problem doing business in Saudi Arabia. Both these ideologies have the same objective.


7 posted on 04/06/2016 6:44:18 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Rafael Cruz: Canadian-born, Cuban ancestry, ineligible for POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The question is whether politically active Christians can motivate churchgoers and other fans of the First Amendment to counteract high-dollar blackmail...

I don't think there are Americans with backbone. There is no line in the sand.

8 posted on 04/06/2016 6:46:58 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg505

This Georgian considers it nauseating that the governor of one of the original 13 states betrayed us to the sodomite- commie special rights gang. A good candidate for impeachment.


9 posted on 04/07/2016 7:29:40 AM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Do we *want* Muslims serving us? Who knows what stunt they may pull in doing so?


10 posted on 04/07/2016 7:34:34 AM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: liberalism is suicide

Exactly why I didn’t like that bill


11 posted on 04/07/2016 9:38:16 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: liberalism is suicide

He’s been a democrat all his life until the last 10-15 years. And he only changed then to keep getting elected.


12 posted on 04/07/2016 11:41:16 AM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Interesting that the new headlines run along these lines: Religious liberty vs. homosexuals. Why don’t they just run headlines that say, religion vs. homosexuality? G-d made it totally clear how he feels about homosexuality. Now, we’re getting an idea why (not counting AIDS).


13 posted on 04/07/2016 6:06:19 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson