I don’t know what US code is?
Son, my life has revolved around U.S. Statutes and Codes for 54 years!
To help you,
“The Code of Laws of the United States of America (often abbreviated as “Code of Laws of the United States”, “United States Code”, “U.S. Code”, or “U.S.C.”) is the official written compilation, record and codification of the general and permanent federal statutes of the United States.”
You’re not a lawyer admitted to any Bar, are you?
Lawyer or not, with you now being aware of both the status of US Codes in general, and the exact reading of 1401 and thereafter, can you provide one legally sustainable fact that would sustain an advanceable argument that Sen Cruz is not a Natural Born Citizen.
If so, make your argument here. Don’t do a Trump and simply say.... No he is not.... Make your argument.
By the way, 1401 is the law of the land. The 1898 case Birters and Trumpsters love to cite is moot in view of 1401. It’s like Dred Scott. It was a SCOTUS decision long ago made irrelevant by current Stature/Code.
Either make your case, or give up.
2) You capitalized the entirety of (g) yet apparently do not comprehend it. You assert "The foreign-born child is a citizen AT the moment of birth". This is not true. If you understood (g) you would know that the foreign-born child of a citizen parent is not a citizen unless the citizen parent meets the requirements of statute.
Note that the foreign-born child of a citizen is not a citizen unless the citizen parent meets the requirements of this statute. The foreign-born child is not a citizen by birth, the foreign-born child is a citizen by this statute.
Statutes “conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens” is naturalization. U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 702-703 (1898)