Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strac6
1) You are applying U.S. Code of 2016 to a person born in 1970. The law in force at the time of birth controls.

2) You capitalized the entirety of (g) yet apparently do not comprehend it. You assert "The foreign-born child is a citizen AT the moment of birth". This is not true. If you understood (g) you would know that the foreign-born child of a citizen parent is not a citizen unless the citizen parent meets the requirements of statute.

536 posted on 04/07/2016 9:50:37 AM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

Sorry but all these posts reveal you are NOT a lawyer.

Current law prevails.

For example, 13th Amendment was passed last day of January, 1965. Did it only free those slaves born after that date?

The whole AT thing is ridiculous. Of course the child is not a NBC unless parent meets all requirements. No law applies unless all requirements are met.... and there is no claim Mrs. Cruz (mother) did not meet all requirements of law.

The other law you quote is long superseded by 1401.

The problem with your posts is some foolish person, also unschooled in the law, might believe them.

No further replies to your posts on this without a $4500 retainer to further educate you on the law. Make the check payable to JimRob!


541 posted on 04/07/2016 3:00:04 PM PDT by Strac6 (Remember, the Primaries are shortlived. ALL THAT MATTERS IS THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson