Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: 'Unborn person' doesn't have constitutional rights
The Hill ^ | April 3, 2016 | Jessie Hellmann

Posted on 04/03/2016 11:30:33 AM PDT by rdl6989

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton said during an interview Sunday that an "unborn person" does not have rights when asked about her abortion stance and whether she believes an "unborn child" has constitutional protections.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; abortion; arkansas; clinton; deathpanels; election2016; hillary; hillary2016; hillaryclinton; hillaryclinton2016; hitlery; newyork; obamacare; plannedparenthood; prolife; stemexpress; wipewater; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: rdl6989
Sorry Hillary, you just spit in the eye of God: ◄ Jeremiah 1:5 ► Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou came forth out of the womb I sanctified thee....
21 posted on 04/03/2016 11:51:07 AM PDT by JohnT416
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Not that I want to, but to be fair she said that’s the state of the laws today, and she’s right.


22 posted on 04/03/2016 11:51:24 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

But illegal immigrants do.


23 posted on 04/03/2016 11:52:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
Hillary Clinton said during an interview Sunday that an "unborn person" does not have rights

Oh yea Hitlery?
Tell that to the full-term baby, only 60 seconds from being born, with scissors puncturing its skull

I thought Roe v Wade implied at least, that in the 3rd trimester, the BABY possibly had some rights?
24 posted on 04/03/2016 11:56:25 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Horseshit.

Clintons are the worst kind of godless liars.


25 posted on 04/03/2016 11:57:25 AM PDT by Gasshog (Stay Tuned for further developments in the CUBAN MISTRESS CRISIS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Logically, placing the line of demarcation at birth is fallacious. If one holds to the view Clinton espouses, there is logically nothing that limits them from setting the line at any age. Pro Choice (Death) advocates are intellectually dishonest...but what liberal isn’t?


26 posted on 04/03/2016 12:03:54 PM PDT by The Unknown Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

They can’t say it’s a baby - if they do they admit they’re all murderers. Hence no constitutional rights. Did National Review and Krauthammer approve her answer?


27 posted on 04/03/2016 12:04:24 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Yet illegals do.


28 posted on 04/03/2016 12:05:16 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Part of the leftwing war on babies.


29 posted on 04/03/2016 12:08:30 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taterjay
From her point if view, the government grants rights. Yet God - the true granter and guarantor of rights - would never affirm her death loving declaration.

"I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.... --Deuternomy 30:19

But to a huma-bred islamist, taqiyya is anything one wants it to be.

30 posted on 04/03/2016 12:09:56 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Hillary Clinton:

“The unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights.”

The Constitution of the United States:

“No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.”

“No state shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”


31 posted on 04/03/2016 12:11:57 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
The woman is evil. Pure and simple.

And so are the 50%+ of americans who support her in this opinion.

32 posted on 04/03/2016 12:14:05 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

The liberals think every other frikin’ thing on the planet seems to have Constitutional rights. But not unborn kids.


33 posted on 04/03/2016 12:15:27 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

It’s no secret that she doesn’t think an unborn child has any rights, but coming right out and saying it doesn’t seem like a very smart thing to do-I wish some interviewer would ask her how she’d feel about it if Chelsea decided tomorrow to abort/kill the unborn person she is currently pregnant with...


34 posted on 04/03/2016 12:25:44 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

She aint pregnant, just really FAT with extra cells that ought be clipped off link a long fingernail.


35 posted on 04/03/2016 12:27:59 PM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: If You Want It Fixed - Fix It

That is why the GOP ( I really don’t think they care) should get behind Trump and let Jeff Sessions pick our Judges


36 posted on 04/03/2016 12:31:28 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Subtitle:

How Roe v. Wade is the 20th century’s answer to Scott v. Sandford.


37 posted on 04/03/2016 12:35:14 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Sta, si cum canibus magnis currere non potes, in portico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gasshog

Agreed.


38 posted on 04/03/2016 12:42:11 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

No, no, no ... Queen of Little Rock. She’s all yours!

Don’t these people believe that anyone from anywhere in the world who happens to be physically in the USA has Constitutional rights? But an unborn child in its mother’s womb within the USA doesn’t?


39 posted on 04/03/2016 12:43:16 PM PDT by EDINVA (#4everTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

Notice no outrage in Hillary Clinton’s answer..she, like the majority of the left, believe that a baby is NOT a baby til he/she is born, they believe that if a woman is in LABOR that its still OK for that woman to say “Abort this baby please” and its all good..but when Donald Trump says that a woman needs to be punished if abortion were banned everyone throws a fit, in my opinion, Trump didnt go far enough..to call these women “Victims” please, the same women that you see walking around with “Im proud of my abortion” t-shirts, are these the “Victims” we are talking about here


40 posted on 04/03/2016 12:44:15 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson