Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uh oh: Did Trump forfeit his South Carolina delegates by breaking his pledge to support the nominee?
Hotair ^ | 03/31/2016 | AllahPundit

Posted on 03/31/2016 2:10:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: dforest

If this GOP crap doesn’t stop I will vote third party for Trump or anyone else. Tired of it.

Reince Prebius sent me a 2016 Congressional district census today. Everyone should see what it is asking. I am calling them tomorrow and telling the sonsabitches I am voting third party if this crap doesn’t stop. Get behind Trump. If they insist on giving us Cruz or Kasich then I will watch with glee when Hillary and minions tear Cruz apart. I am done being lied to. Trump may be a snake but then so are all of THEM.


41 posted on 03/31/2016 3:55:21 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Ted Cruz has five mistresses? Why five? Why not four or six or nine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Wrong. Cruz did NOT say he will not support the GOP nominee. Cruz actually said this: “I don’t make it a habit to support people who attack my family”. He left himself room to still support Trump if he wins. He could say, well I don’t make it a habit to support people who attack my family, but in this instance, when the alternative is Hillary Clinton, I will make an exception.


42 posted on 03/31/2016 3:55:44 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Cruznadians are smoking the good stuff!


43 posted on 03/31/2016 3:58:00 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

All debaters know how to drop an implication


44 posted on 03/31/2016 4:09:22 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“I hereby affirm that I generally believe in and intend to support the nominees and platform of the Republican Party in the November 8, 2016 general election.”

I'm no lawyer, but even I can see enough weasel words in that statement to drive several trucks through.

45 posted on 03/31/2016 4:20:46 PM PDT by vikingd00d (nulla seruitus turpior est quam uoluntaria -- Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

From Greenpapers SC page:

Each congressional district delegate ... shall be bound during the first ballot at the convention to the presidential candidate who received the greatest number of votes .... If the candidate who received the greatest number of votes in that particular delegate’s home district is not placed in nomination, a delegate must then be bound to the congressional district’s second or third place finisher in the presidential preference primary, respectively. If none of the top three finishers in the congressional district presidential preference primary are placed in nomination, delegates shall be unbound.
Each delegate-at-large shall be bound for the first ballot to the candidate who received the largest number of votes statewide in the presidential preference primary. If the candidate who receives the greatest number of statewide votes in the presidential preference primary is not placed in nomination, a delegate must then be bound to the state’s second or third place finisher in the presidential preference primary, respectively. If none of the top three finishers in the statewide presidential preference primary are placed in nomination, delegates shall be unbound. [South Carolina Republican Party Rules - Rule 11(b)(4), (5)]

He won them fair & square.


46 posted on 03/31/2016 4:22:12 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

The pledge was non-binding anyway


47 posted on 03/31/2016 4:45:31 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed theThe l ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Did you hit the Word Wrap button then the spell button on the ‘Posting Comment’ page?

That's when the code characters showed up in the edit (but not the preview) box for me. Can't get rid of them in this post - will check next post without those buttons.

48 posted on 03/31/2016 5:09:44 PM PDT by RebelTex (Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
"If Trump gets the nomination, Cruz doesn’t become president."

"If the nomination is stolen by convention trickery from Trump, he runs 3rd Party and Hillary becomes president."

I think you left something out there. Trump may not win the nomination, not through trickery, but by not winning a majority of the delegates.

49 posted on 03/31/2016 5:14:02 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes, ‘cause Cruz is a sleazy insider, of course.


50 posted on 03/31/2016 5:37:57 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
The people who support this nonsense need to be punched.

Or at least pepper sprayed.

51 posted on 03/31/2016 6:15:32 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

RE: Yes, ‘cause Cruz is a sleazy insider, of course.

Actually Cruz is being tactical, within the rules of the convention of course.


52 posted on 03/31/2016 6:30:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

RE: I can see enough weasel words in that statement to drive several trucks through.

Or it could be what he intended it to mean.


53 posted on 03/31/2016 6:33:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mlo
There is no scenario where Cruz can get the majority of delegates before the convention.

Thus, either Trump will be our nominee, or something perceived as trickery will be employed to deny the nomination to him though he clearly had far more delegates entering the convention.

I am just telling you for 100% certain that if Trump goes to the convention with the most delegates even if not an outright majority and doesn't leave the convention with the nomination. He will bolt and take his supporters with him and in the process hand the nomination to Hillary.

It's just that simple.

54 posted on 03/31/2016 6:36:34 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
"I am just telling you for 100% certain that if Trump goes to the convention with the most delegates even if not an outright majority and doesn't leave the convention with the nomination. He will bolt and take his supporters with him and in the process hand the nomination to Hillary."

You may be right, he's certainly capable of it. But if he doesn't get a majority of the delegates going in to the convention then his supporters are mistaken that he's somehow entitled to the nomination anyway. That would be a case where a majority of the delegates were for someone else, and those delegates have a right to agree to pick one of their own candidates if that's what they chose to do. The contest isn't about just getting more delegates than everyone else, it's about getting a majority.

55 posted on 03/31/2016 7:43:04 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’s still a sleazy insider! He can’t help himself.


56 posted on 04/01/2016 4:17:41 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
And honestly, at this point, I wouldn’t even blame Trump for doing it, and would gladly vote 3rd party to register my disdain.

It would save me from having to vote for Hillary, but I would still have to vote straight Democrat down ticket.

57 posted on 04/01/2016 4:23:18 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mlo
But if he doesn't get a majority of the delegates going in to the convention then his supporters are mistaken that he's somehow entitled to the nomination anyway.

If the GOPe takes your attitude, watch the swing state and blue state congressional districts. Enjoy the rat House and Senate.

58 posted on 04/01/2016 4:32:02 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
"But if he doesn't get a majority of the delegates going in to the convention then his supporters are mistaken that he's somehow entitled to the nomination anyway."

"If the GOPe takes your attitude, watch the swing state and blue state congressional districts. Enjoy the rat House and Senate."

This isn't my "attitude". It ought to be as uncontroversial as saying the sky is blue. The nominee is the person who gets a majority of delegates at the convention. It's called majority rule. It's not who gets the most, it's who gets a majority. If candidate A doesn't win a majority then that means a majority does support candidate B, or candidates B and C. If the delegates for B and C want to come to an agreement and vote for one of their candidates they have that right. To say otherwise is to say that a majority of the delegates (those for B and C) don't get to have a say, which is absurd.

This isn't trickery. It isn't stealing. It's simple majority rule. The only problem Trump has with it is that he may not win if he doesn't get a majority going in. So what? That doesn't make it wrong. And if it was one of the other candidates in his position he'd find no problem with the prospect of winning through making a deal with another candidates delegates.

59 posted on 04/01/2016 10:08:30 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mlo
This isn't trickery. It isn't stealing. It's simple majority rule. The only problem Trump has with it is that he may not win if he doesn't get a majority going in. So what? That doesn't make it wrong. And if it was one of the other candidates in his position he'd find no problem with the prospect of winning through making a deal with another candidates delegates.

That's terribly rational of you old chap. Enjoy the demise of the GOP. History in the making.

60 posted on 04/01/2016 10:17:49 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson