This reporter should be sued for the headline “Glenn Beck’s lie...”
Glenn Beck got his information from intel sources who risked their careers to give him that information. He passed it on to the MSM because the story was of such significance that it needed to come from them. And reporters wrote stories on it, based on the evidence he gave them. But the incestuous media heads would not allow the reports to air.
By the time this court case (if there is one) rolls around, it would be a Cruz or Trump DOJ or State Dept that would deal with the whistleblower, and he/she would come forward and testify on behalf of Beck. Otherwise, Obama’s DOJ/CIA would gag the guy just like Schaffer was gagged by the DOJ when Curt Weldon brought forward the Able Danger issue. And the guy would lose his pension, etc - like all whistleblowers do under the Obama regime.
I don’t agree with everything BEck does and I suspect he needs to get back on his meds, but he has definitely been on the right side of history when it comes to exposing many bad things. It’s too bad that 2008 was a coup, complete with threats to the media which resulted in a propaganda arm such as the gal who wrote this article. She was careful to couch her claims in words that don’t directly accuse people - thus making her unable to be sued, much like the National Enquirer did with the Cruz mistress allegations - but they DID screw up on the headline, which references “Glenn Beck’s lies”.
Then again, why am I even typing because the moderators are pretending that my account is less than a week old.
Thanks for that rational explanation, Beck has done many good things when it comes to exposing hidden details of important issues and this is one of them ,, the only minor flaw I see in your post is that I see the story writer as protected from the headline as most writers do not create their own headlines , a nameless editorial staff writer does that.