Let's analyze just one incident from the past 24 hours (there are many more to analyze).
In courts of law in this nation, are the testimonies of witnesses admissible? What about Tweets or InstaGram messages?
Sure they are. The Judge can allow or disallow, but Tweets are used every single day in courts of law in America. In fact, Divorce cases use them all the time.
Yesterday, Amanda Carpenter claimed on Twitter that photos of her sitting in a revealing dress on a bed with condoms (SkYn condoms to be exact) next to her were "photoshopped."
But her InstaGram photos (that she posted herself) reveal that she is lying.
That is one bit of evidence to me that indicates that this story is probably true.
Also, Cruz's behavior and statements would be admissible in a court of law. And his performance yesterday with Carly Fiorina was unconvincing and raised more questions that it answered. Also, why was half a million dollars paid from his campaign to hers while she was still a viable candidate?
That too, would be something that would be brought up in a court of law.
So you see, your attempt to say that everything here is tabloid trash or innuendo is not truthful. There is more than smoke here, and there is hard evidence that something is amiss.