No, there is much more than "innuendo" here, and you know it.
Let's analyze just one incident from the past 24 hours (there are many more to analyze).
In courts of law in this nation, are the testimonies of witnesses admissible? What about Tweets or InstaGram messages?
Sure they are. The Judge can allow or disallow, but Tweets are used every single day in courts of law in America. In fact, Divorce cases use them all the time.
Yesterday, Amanda Carpenter claimed on Twitter that photos of her sitting in a revealing dress on a bed with condoms (SkYn condoms to be exact) next to her were "photoshopped."
But her InstaGram photos (that she posted herself) reveal that she is lying.
That is one bit of evidence to me that indicates that this story is probably true.
Also, Cruz's behavior and statements would be admissible in a court of law. And his performance yesterday with Carly Fiorina was unconvincing and raised more questions that it answered. Also, why was half a million dollars paid from his campaign to hers while she was still a viable candidate?
That too, would be something that would be brought up in a court of law.
So you see, your attempt to say that everything here is tabloid trash or innuendo is not truthful. There is more than smoke here, and there is hard evidence that something is amiss.
That's all one giant nothingburger and anyone with an objective bone in his body or one micron of balance would clearly see it. But that's not going to happen with folks who will plumb any depths to destroy the opposition. If that opposition were Hillary I'd be cheering you on. But it is a fellow conservative, not a NY moderate with a history of championing democrats and liberal causes while bedding the wives of the people he calls friends.
This is not the behavior of Christians, especially when it involves other Christians. When there is proof of the allegations, I'll hold Cruz accountable in a way that will absolutely end his campaign. What you're engaged in, however, is wanton character assassination for political gain based on hearsay. How often does the mainstream media show better judgment than supposed conservatives?
So you see, your attempt to say that everything here is tabloid trash or innuendo is not truthful. There is more than smoke here, and there is hard evidence that something is amiss. So did you put any effort with your sleuthing abilities to the whole "off the record" meeting Donnie had with the N.Y. Times? Don't see anything amiss aobut that?
How about Donnie claiming the BBB sent his a fax DURING the Detroit Debate claiming the Trump U. had a AAA rating? Come on now, if you are claiming this ability explain how Donnie ended up with a fax at 9pm from the BBB live during the event AND that the BBB released a statement a day or two later that said it DID NOT fax any document to them during the event?
I'll wait while you draw the diagrams explaining all the possibilities other than Donnie does what Donnie is best at and lie... /s