Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds to Fine Schools for Not Following Michelle Obama’s Lunch Rules
Washington Examiner ^ | 3/28/16 | Elizabeth Harrington

Posted on 03/28/2016 4:55:01 PM PDT by Nachum

The federal government is taking steps to fine schools that do not comply with first lady Michelle Obama’s school lunch rules. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a proposed rule Monday to codify parts of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, which was championed by Mrs. Obama. The regulation would punish schools and state departments with fines for “egregious or persistent disregard” for the lunch rules that imposed sodium and calorie limits and banned white grains. A West Virginia preschool teacher was threatened with fines for violating the rules by rewarding her students with candy for good

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: education; lunch; michelle; michelleschoollunch; rules; schoollunch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Nachum

Fine the schools? The schools don’t care as it’s not skin off their backs. All they have to do is raise property tax. It’s you and me who the feds are fining. It’s long past time for We the People to take our country back.


21 posted on 03/28/2016 5:07:21 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Idiots...The feds need to get out of the schools!


22 posted on 03/28/2016 5:08:11 PM PDT by jazusamo (When judges act like whores, they can hardly expect to be treated like nuns: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This bs affect even private schools.

We quit buying it... sending sack lunches instead.

They gonna fine me too???


23 posted on 03/28/2016 5:08:29 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

If old Wide-A will eat the same as the kids, I’m good with it. Bettin’ that ain’t gonna happen, tho.


24 posted on 03/28/2016 5:10:39 PM PDT by West Texas Chuck (OBAMA: Fundamentally Twerking America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Texas Chuck
I understand there are specially-designed chairs at the White House for the First Lady...


25 posted on 03/28/2016 5:14:19 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Rubio: All the slipperiness of Bill Clinton, with none of the smarts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse
Many of the schools involved already have fully subsidized breakfasts and lunches, and those students who pay “full price” really aren't since the full price is also partially subsidized. Packing lunches will not, unfortunately, kill the beast.
26 posted on 03/28/2016 5:23:37 PM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthy,_Hunger-Free_Kids_Act_of_2010


27 posted on 03/28/2016 5:24:05 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

The thing about that photo is not just the size issue, but the poise. Look at the differences in postures.


28 posted on 03/28/2016 5:25:35 PM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Sorry, but no law was passed. moochelle acted illegally and stupidly.


29 posted on 03/28/2016 5:25:45 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers and is absolutely incompatible with Western society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Then Obama has another 20 just to manage his online accounts.


30 posted on 03/28/2016 5:27:56 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

That is too bad. Well, if everyone brought their own lunch and ate a decent breakfast at home that would fix it. I wonder though if not one child bought a school lunch, would they still cook ( I use that term loosely) it and then just place it directly in the trash ( which is pretty much what happens anyway)


31 posted on 03/28/2016 5:28:21 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: econjack; Nachum

Not his fault he’s big boned. Compare upper arm size.


32 posted on 03/28/2016 5:30:00 PM PDT by upchuck (MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

LOL, nice.


33 posted on 03/28/2016 5:31:32 PM PDT by West Texas Chuck (OBAMA: Fundamentally Twerking America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Paging, Sir Mixalot, she gots big butts.


34 posted on 03/28/2016 5:32:32 PM PDT by West Texas Chuck (OBAMA: Fundamentally Twerking America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse
The school in which I teach is a low income, urban high school. We receive a fed grant to feed both breakfast and lunch to all of our students, regardless of parents’ income. The “food” is crap. The portions are minuscule. They have to feed the kids what is provided under the grant. IMHO, General Mills has probably given a lot of campaign donations to the right people, as that is the brand our school uses the most. The food is mostly prepackaged crap. Breakfast, for example, is bags of strawberry yogurt Chex Mix (neither strawberries nor yogurt are on the ingredient list) and cups of grape juice (10% juice). Lunch is a cup of soup and a package of graham crackers. But hey, my students got what their moms and grandmas voted for! I remind them of that almost daily.
35 posted on 03/28/2016 5:39:12 PM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

I wonder if I could sue our school district for my daughter’s anorexia? She just got out of treatment and so far so good. But what a terrible thing that is. (It is the most deadly mental health issue). It started when she took her required health and nutrition class. Harmless at first - “I just want to eat healthy”.

The recovery center she went to is trying to get the notice out there how bad these classes can be to some kids, and getting the parents aware, and try to determine what kids might be at risk from taking the classes.


36 posted on 03/28/2016 5:44:05 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Patriots, with all due respect to FLOTUS, noting that FLOTUS was indoctrinated at Harvard Law School as were several state sovereignty-ignoring actvist Supreme Court justices, that school evidently not teaching the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood, please consider the following.

As mentioned in related threads, note that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via tha Constitution, the specific power to decide policy for any aspect of INTRAstate public schools, including dictating what is on school lunch menus.


37 posted on 03/28/2016 5:44:31 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

No, but they dangle money in front of the school and attach mandates to the funding. We get what we deserve.


38 posted on 03/28/2016 5:48:04 PM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
"Sorry, but no law was passed. moochelle acted illegally and stupidly."

Madame Mao.
39 posted on 03/28/2016 5:51:27 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun; All
"No, but they dangle money in front of the school and attach mandates to the funding."

Note that a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress is prohibited from appropriating taxes in the name of state power issues, basically any issue which Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

Further note that taxing and spend for intrastate schools is not a Section 8-limited power. So when intrastate schools accept vote-winning federal funding, they are arguably recovering state revenues which should never have left the states, such revenues essentially “legally” stolen from the states by mean of unconstitutional federal taxes.

40 posted on 03/28/2016 6:04:22 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson