Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

To me, I have not seen where Trump categorically and formally demanded this to the rules committee. If he has, I’d like to see it so I can be informed to real facts.

By morphing campaign talk into the equivalent actual ‘demands’ only in the sense that Trump is the sole offender is disingenuous, particularly in light of many members of the GOPe poweratti actively advocating even taking away a legitimate 1237 lead if that candidate be Donald Trump. And all this, even before the actual nomination convention is actually convened.


30 posted on 03/25/2016 4:14:17 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
I hold you to be one of the more reasonable of the Trump supporters and did not intend to imply that you lacked respect for the Constitution.

I have no knowledge of Trump making a formal demand that the rules be changed in his favor but I am aware of statements or tweets to that effect.

As I said, it is better to inform ourselves now of the facts and history of the rules situation than to be blindsided at the last minute in a dispute that Trump has clearly initiated if only on an informal level.Surely you don't suggest that we would be better served by conscious pursuit of ignorance?


31 posted on 03/25/2016 4:23:48 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson