Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USAF reveals Northrop's B-21 long-range strike bomber
Flightglobal.com ^ | 26 FEBRUARY, 2016 | JAMES DREW

Posted on 02/26/2016 9:06:22 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The US Air Force has revealed its bomber for the 21st century, the Northrop Grumman B-21 long-range strike bomber.

The official designation comes as the air force for the first time releases an artist's rendering of the still-classified bomber — a flying wing design similar to the Northrop B-2 and the company's concept for the previous Next-Generation Bomber (NGB) project.

The air force hasn’t purchased a new bomber in this century and is still dependent on 54-year-old Boeing B-52H and 28-year-old B-1B. Its 21-year-old B-2 Spirit, the only in-service stealth bomber, will be in use through 2060, officials say.

Revealed at the closing of her “state of the air force” address in Orlando, Florida today, USAF secretary Deborah Lee James revealed the official B-21 designation to rapturous applause.

“Our fifth-generation global precision attack platform will give our country a networked sensor-shoot capability that will allow us to hold targets at risk in a way the world and our adversaries have never, ever seen,” says James.

US Air Force

Many bomber experts have been pushing the B-3 tag as a sequential follow-on to the B-1 and B-2. However, Mitchell Institute dean David Deptula believes the new designation reflects that fact that it is the air force’s premier bomber platform for the 21st century.

“It’s not surprising in terms of the shape based on the physics of low observability, but it’s good that we have an artist’s rendering out and the designation is a good one too,” says the former three-star air force officer.

The air force picked Northrop’s design in October and is proceeding with development after the US Government Accountability Office rejected losing team Boeing and Lockheed Martin’s bid protest.

The new stealth bomber will cost $23.5 billion to develop and is worth $564 million per aircraft, according to US government estimates.

USAF wants 100 B-21s, but Deptula believes the true requirement should be 174.

“We need 174 of them,” he tells Flightglobal after the announcement. “We need a minimum of one squadron for 12 air expeditionary forces to establish the rotational base requirement during peace time to be able to shape and maintain peace and stability around the world.

“We need that number to maintain the ability to support our national security strategy to engage in two major regional conflicts if, in fact, it’s necessary to go to war, particularly in the advanced threat environment that has been growing.”

Northrop’s bomber team was characteristically coy in its response to the unveiling: “Northrop Grumman is proud to serve as the prime contractor for the B-21 Bomber in partnership with the US Air Force, to deliver a capability that is vital to our national security. Any further questions should be directed to the air force.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bomber; northropgrumman; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2016 9:06:22 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
USAF wants 100 B-21s, but Deptula believes the true requirement should be 174.

You'll get 2 and like it.

2 posted on 02/26/2016 9:10:09 AM PST by KarlInOhio (An orange jumpsuit is the new black pantsuit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I don’t see engine exhausts or nozzles on the drawing. I doubt that they will be under the fuselage (wing) for stealthy reasons.


3 posted on 02/26/2016 9:11:10 AM PST by Purdue77 ("...shall not be infringed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

They probably have the exhaust coming out of the trailing edge of the wing, like on the F-117.


4 posted on 02/26/2016 9:16:02 AM PST by hoagy62 (Timid Men prefer the 'Calm of Despotism' to the 'Tempestuous Sea of Liberty'. ~ T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If there are pilot seats in it, they’re doing it wrong.


5 posted on 02/26/2016 9:16:25 AM PST by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

2, if they can make all the cost cutting need to get as many F35s as possible, if not, canceled.


6 posted on 02/26/2016 9:18:51 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

I suppose it’ll be using toroidal power like that thing that was on the X-Files.


7 posted on 02/26/2016 9:26:40 AM PST by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The new stealth bomber will cost $23.5 billion to develop and is worth $564 million per aircraft

Seems almost unreal. At those prices, how long will this system be useful and available in a war that lasts longer than 12 months?

8 posted on 02/26/2016 9:26:53 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
You'll get 2 and like it.

My thoughts exactly...at $500 billion a pop.

9 posted on 02/26/2016 9:31:07 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hattend

US Nuclear Bombers “When you care enough to send the very best”


10 posted on 02/26/2016 9:41:00 AM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
Seems almost unreal. At those prices, how long will this system be useful and available in a war that lasts longer than 12 months?

1. Who says that any modern war between advanced nations would last longer than, say, three weeks? (Not proxy war, not prolonged asymmetrical war - I mean all-out war between nearly-equal opponents.)

2. What is your counter-proposal?

Regards,

11 posted on 02/26/2016 9:57:09 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

So what happened to B-3 through B-20?


12 posted on 02/26/2016 9:58:20 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

-—The new stealth bomber will cost $23.5 billion to develop and is worth $564 million per aircraft, according to US government estimates.-—

Assuming those “estimates” are less than 2 standard deviations away from reality, that is still some serious coin.

Yet people scoff at the money it would probably cost to put the hammer down on the illegal invasion and eradicate all the terror sleeper cells. And yes, the applicable federal and state agencies know exactly where they are.


13 posted on 02/26/2016 9:58:29 AM PST by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jz638
If there are pilot seats in it, they’re doing it wrong.

Cyborgs aren't here yet. When you are comfortable riding in a bus that has no driver, get back to me about pilot-less aircraft.

14 posted on 02/26/2016 10:00:28 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
to be able to shape and maintain peace and stability around the world

F*** that,

15 posted on 02/26/2016 10:00:44 AM PST by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown, are by desperate appliance relieved, or not at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I love the USAF, but they are on crack if they think they will get 100 B-2. Not even in the cold war was the US going to deploy 100. That would be hugely expensive - stealth maintenance is time consuming and labor intensive.


16 posted on 02/26/2016 10:04:53 AM PST by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The North American XB-21, it also never entered service and only a prototype was built.

17 posted on 02/26/2016 10:07:09 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The minor technical details aside, we need to know if the design team is sufficiently racially diverse, and are there enough transgender pilots identified for the training program?


18 posted on 02/26/2016 10:12:55 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

Slight oversight that will cost quadrillions to address.


19 posted on 02/26/2016 10:16:54 AM PST by mcshot (The "Greatest Generation" would never have allowed the trashing of our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Our F-35s will be splashed and augured in the first minutes.


20 posted on 02/26/2016 10:20:32 AM PST by mcshot (The "Greatest Generation" would never have allowed the trashing of our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson