Posted on 02/11/2016 10:24:19 AM PST by dynoman
Proof in debate transcripts at link.
Subject does not matter. You have been informed of your abuse and told to knock it off.
Another red herring. The subject of the thread is Ted’s seven lies during three minutes in a Fox interview.
Cruz supporters need to deflect the discussion away from that to me personally because they don’t want to face the truth about Ted’s lies.
This isn’t brain surgery, the obfuscation and disingenuousness in play is very plain to see.
Read this;
C. Steven Tucker - Chicago Tea Party
https://www.tedcruz.org/news/cruz-for-president-announces-illinois-leadership-team/
He’s an honest Cruz supporter. More than you could say about many here on FR.
Do these posts talk about Ted selling out to Nancy, Chuck U, Reid, Rotten and Mitch, as Trump has?
It doesn’t matter. You’ve lost. The latest South Carolina polls, Trump 36%, Cruz 19%, Rubio 15%, Bush 11%. Poll taken Feb 10-11. Keep shoveling the slime. It’s not working. Ding. You lose.
My “conservative” IDOL Donald Trump said all these things? Where are my smelling salts? *thud*
“Subject does not matter. You have been informed of your abuse and told to knock it off.”
Subject does not matter? Discussion here is all about the posters and not about issues and subjects??
Wow.
Jim, nor any other admin or moderator, has contacted me. I think they are smart enough to see it’s not abuse to list the seven lies in the Fox interview; It’s not abuse to link the C. Steven Tucker article.
I’m sure they see people don’t want to face Ted’s lies and dirty politics (the subject of the OP) so they make it about me personally. If there is abuse that’s where it is - in the attempts to make the discussion about me personally.
What’s going on is undeniably transparent, I’d guess that is no one on the admin team has contacted me in spite of the ridiculous allegation that I’m the one abusing people on this thread.
Equivocation.
Except Trump would never appoint a Scalia or Thomas. Can’t believe anyone is so naive as to believe he would.
read post 442.
Your abuse of the ping feature has been duly reported.
“Pinging people to a thread they have not posted (I have not) to Troll them is abuse of the ping feature and shows you keep a Trolling list.”
This is funny. The mods will see I rarely ping multiple people, and when I do it’s not a canned list. I do not have any saved ping lists let alone a “Trolling list”.
I picked people from the yesterday’s ping list - the “ping” link at the top of the page. I intended to ping those who were constantly changing the subject of this thread to me personally.
I was wrong about you being one of them. I’m sorry.
Trump will appoint his NY pals. He probably can’t even name a single conservative judge waiting in the wings.
“When Tim Russert asked me on Meet the Press if I would ban partial-birth abortion if I were president, my pro-choice instincts led me to say no. After the show, I consulted two doctors I respect and, upon learning more about this procedure, I have concluded that I would indeed support a ban.”
“But Trump said in his book, The America We Deserve, which was published in 2000, that he was wrong to say he supported late-term abortion. After he talked with doctors, he wrote, he would indeed support a ban on the procedure.”
“Except Trump would never appoint a Scalia or Thomas.”
How to you know that for a fact?
Nya nya
it takes one to know one
All he said is that his plan will make sure everybody is covered, meaning with health insurance.
I’ve been posting that one - it gets ignored and people try to shift the issue to me personally.
They are in denial I guess. I for one will not vote for a liar.
GO TRUMP!!
Nice you can read trumys mind and all of corse there are no specifics on trumys site unlike Cruz’s site
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.