Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator

Polling wise Trump was supposed to win big in Iowa. That is why a 4 point Cruz win was considered a big deal. Anything other than a big win in NH will be a loss for Trump. It’s about the story not reality. We’re talking the media here after all.


9 posted on 02/07/2016 7:08:09 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: D Rider

If you take out cheating, trump won and every voter knows it now.


13 posted on 02/07/2016 7:11:28 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: D Rider

Trump was never up big in Iowa, 4 or 5% tops.

In fact, they were doubtful he’d win saying had to have big turnout.


21 posted on 02/07/2016 7:22:29 AM PST by Kenny (RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: D Rider

You couldn’t be more wrong, because you fail to understand the difference between a caucus and a regular primary.

Especially in wintery Iowa, by the time you leave house and return could easily exceed 3 hours. Many places we saw on TV news, there were no chairs to sit. Wait in lines to get inside. Then listen to boring propaganda from supporters of other candidates. Finally get to vote and fight the snow storm driving home. Only the most dedicated evangelists endure this punishment. Most Iowa caucuses attract less than 6% of eligible voters.

The turn out in NH will be FOUR TIMES bigger in percentage of population terms. Results will be Much closer to poll predictions.


96 posted on 02/07/2016 10:16:10 AM PST by entropy12 (Trump is the only one not bought off by ultra-rich donors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson