Good. These three are better than any other network in asking questions that don’t allow candidates to go into memorized spiels.
Unlike many, I love hard questions. Standing on a stage in well-tailored clothes and makeup, facing America and being put on the spot by a panel of journalists, is NOTHING compared to doing the job for which they are interviewing.
Presidents age in dog years. Look at before and afters: young and vital when they are sworn in, old and grizzled when they come out.
Bring on the gotcha questions. I want to see who can stand the heat.
Complete BS. They are no where near as good as the Fox Buxiness moderators. Even CNN had better moderators then the buffonish behavior of Wallace and kelly I guess you are more interested in Moderators who push your agenda then honest moderators who work to make the debate about the candidates, not the moderators egos,.
I guess I can understand the ignorance. Real moderators have been gone so long for these things most of you don’t understand the proper role of the moderator.
The moderator is there to manage the clock and ask questions to spark a discussion amount the candiates that shows allow the debators to compare/contrast their views and positions.
Clown moderators ask questions designed to interject themselves into the debate. They ask questions that really have no bearing on anything but the modetor trying to show off for their fellow clowns in the “news” media.
Kelly and Wallace are ego driven publicity whores more interested in hyping their career by showing off their “toughness” then doing their job. Instead of serious policy questions, we get the standard issue Media jackass behavior.
Based on their conduct the RNC should tell Fox to pick some OTHER Fox personalities who can actually moderate or lose the debate slot.
The thing that shocks me how much Imam Obama has aged, considering he does not seem to care about the USAm and doesn’t start work till 10am.