Posted on 02/04/2016 10:28:57 AM PST by GIdget2004
Well I sure appreciate the spirit in which you took....so much hostility on here lately..I can discuss the pro and cons of anyone(except Obama and Hillary) and stay civil. Hard to stay civil when speaking about traitors.
Okay, I have read through all the comments so far, and no one has brought this up yet:
Why is the RNC contracting with FOX to do this debate? Why aren’t they trying to get a sponsor that doesn’t try to make themselves the focus of the debate? Isn’t the RNC supposed to try and benefit all candidates, not just the ones they are trying to push?
I think the problem here is the RNC, not FOX. (But I am not saying that FOX doesn’t have problems. I think they should be “out of the running” to get anymore debates.)
And just for the record, no I am not a Trump supporter. Don’t care if he shows up or not. These “debates” are jokes anyway.
They look like Batman or James Bond villains with the cheesy smiles.
The thing that shocks me how much Imam Obama has aged, considering he does not seem to care about the USAm and doesn’t start work till 10am.
“No, that was a factual statement.”
No, he boycotted the debate over the press release by Roger Ailes.
I’d tune in to that instead of the debate just to stick it to MK and FOX News.
I’ve wondered the same thing. May be medical.
After tiring of Trump’s childish behavior, threatening to boycott the debate over Kelly, Fox sent out a mocking message which Trump used as an excuse to duck the mean girl.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.