Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[false] Reports question Trump's giving to veterans groups
Fox News ^ | 2016 January 29 | Adam Shaw

Posted on 01/31/2016 5:24:05 PM PST by CutePuppy

Donald Trump announced Friday he raised $6 million for veterans at his fundraiser in Iowa the night before.

But this would appear a significant increase from what he's given to the cause before, according to some reports which questioned whether the billionaire businessman has been a consistent donor to vet groups.

Showbiz 411 reports that the Donald J. Trump Foundation gave a total of $2.6 million in charitable donations in the last three years, but only a fraction has gone to veterans groups. In 2012, Trump gave nothing, in 2013 he gave $6,000 and in 2014 he gave $16,000, according to the report.

The Weekly Standard reports that the foundation donated $57,000 to veterans groups between 2009 and 2013, only a small amount of the $5.5 million it gave in total during that period of time.

..... < snip >

"These reports are not accurate. Mr. Trump has made substantial personal contributions to a number of Veterans organizations as well as in-kind donations," Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks** told FoxNews.com Friday.

..... < snip >

The Weekly Standard reports that Trump's foundation, meanwhile, gave at least $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

..... < snip >

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; adamshaw; celebrity; charity; checkbookparty; cnsrvtvtreehouse; dds; election2016; erickerickson; false; foxnews; glennbeck; hecanwinparty; hicks; hopehicks; iowa; marklevin; mediasmear; megynkelly; military; newyork; opmcharities; otherpeoplesmoney; pinkstain; pinkstate; politico; propaganda; redstate; redstategathering; rogerailes; smear; stupidparty; sundance; tds; trump; usevets4trump; veterans; whitekanye; whiteobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: austinaero

I know of one too, and he is King of Kings and Lord of Lords.


101 posted on 01/31/2016 7:40:56 PM PST by Catsrus (I callz 'em as I seez 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Would be very interesting to see a verifiable documentation backing your personal assertion ‘It’s not accurate but another attempt by the media to smear Trump’?

Show us the money.


102 posted on 01/31/2016 7:41:20 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
....”What he tried to do was outshine the Republican debate. The veterans were the tool he used for the attempt.”.....

That's right...I have to agree with your assessment. It also shielded his ego from the potential for criticism and possible voters leaving his flock that he would have otherwise had going it alone on stage, if fewer showed up or watched....He wouldn't risk that considering the dynamics happening over his running from the debate.

Trumps first concern will always be protecting his ego above all else...one way or the other . “Dressing “ whatever stage or venue is necessary to shore that up. and it will generally be in direct proportion to whatever he's being criticized about....in this case he was taking a beating for running from the debate. He will always have to stage a “show” in view of his followers and critics that will “prove otherwise” in his own eyes.

After 30 years or so in the entertainment industry Trump knows well how to ‘create whatever stage’ is needed for the “show” to go on.... To sustain his viewing audience... and to protect himself.

103 posted on 01/31/2016 7:42:42 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Live by the sword, die by the sword.


104 posted on 01/31/2016 7:43:48 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

What is wrong with you? I made no assertions just said I’d seen these stories and the media is pushing it.

Do you read posts before you respond?


105 posted on 01/31/2016 7:44:12 PM PST by Kenny (RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

It’s not accurate but another attempt by the media to smear Trump. ‘Its not accurate’ is an unsubstantiated assertion, until you, the asserter, backs your assertion up with verifiable sources.


106 posted on 01/31/2016 7:50:56 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Put the reefer down and slowly back away.


107 posted on 01/31/2016 7:53:07 PM PST by Kenny (RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

And at this point in 1980, Jimmy Carter was leading Ronald Reagan in popularity, 62%-30%.
A long way to go to the nomination and election.

Quit jumping on the “now popular” bandwagon.


Never on the wagon. Nothing has changed since the shock of the first debate. Trump leads. Rabble below jockeying for the seat next to head of table, because leaders lead, politicians politic, and collectivist steal from us all.

It’s TRUMP or Hillary.


108 posted on 01/31/2016 7:56:12 PM PST by QuigleyDU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: QuigleyDU
It always amazes me to see how 2 people can see 2 different outcomes based on the same data.

I see an early Trump domination in the polls but a falling off in Iowa, yet you see that he's already sewn-up the nomination with Hillary! as his eventual opponent.

First of all, it looks quite likely that her thighness will be going down hard either from an indictment or the mindless low-info voters losing interest in her and supporting the Bern.

Secondly, Trump, IMHO, will be a passing infatuation with a lot of his supporters, especially as they see the numerous times Trump has supported liberals and liberal policies in the past.

Oh, it's going to get more down and dirty like we've never seen it before...EVER.

But of course, time will tell if I'm wrong, but I sincerely doubt your match-up.

BTW, welcome to Free Republic.

109 posted on 01/31/2016 8:12:54 PM PST by PROCON (Proud CRUZader!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
I wonder how much you people criticizing him gave?

We're not running for the presidency, and we're not billionaires. Day-to-day expenses are a concern in a way they're not with Trump. Trump is using the donations to defuse charges about his liberal record. For non-true believers, it stinks of deceptive behavior. Do we really want to find out that Trump is a white Obama after he's elected?

110 posted on 01/31/2016 8:14:12 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

Because it is just a hit piece produced by people who hate seeing others be happy and create a little happiness for others.


111 posted on 01/31/2016 8:22:46 PM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

So you really do not have anything to back up your bogus claim. How Trump-like. If you did have any verification, you would have been able to respond other than childishly.

May I assist you to references to psychological ‘projection’?


112 posted on 01/31/2016 9:25:25 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Dem party will not let Clinton lose. Just creating a little drama for the folks. The nomination is hers.

Media including FOX has and has had the long knives out for Trump once they realized he is serious. He poses the biggest threat to the Washington entitled establishment of Dems and Reps, and also the media who relish their power to choose for us. As exampled by FOX this weekend strongly pushing Rubio, while completely ignoring the leader, Trump. These media stories and non stories aren’t accidental there deliberate, Rubio is a lightweight, they know this, he doesn’t have the persona to take on Clinton and press. That then leads to the obvious conclusion, there in the bag for Hillary. Quite disturbing to me that so many conservatives here don’t see whats happening. I’ll state it again, if Trump is not our candidate, Clinton will be president.


113 posted on 01/31/2016 9:27:13 PM PST by QuigleyDU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
There were more people watching the debate without Trump than there were a week earlier when he participated.

A good thing too. It turned into an actual debate instead of "The Trump Show" - reality TV doesn't interest me much.

114 posted on 01/31/2016 11:45:13 PM PST by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei; caww; X-spurt; norwaypinesavage; ironman; Mariner; Sacajaweau; PghBaldy; silverleaf; ...
What Trump got / gets in exchange for his 2 (as his spokeswoman Hope Hicks said) "in-kind" donations in Manhattan:

From 2007 account (skipping the material about his marriages):

From another source, on 1987 parade :

From Veterans Day Parade Tries for a Comeback - NYT, November 10, 1995:

In conclusion : Donald Trump is quick to take the personal credit but in reality he had collected most of the donated money from the political and business friends and associates (OPM) and matched the funds in 1987 to "save" the parade that "was in transition" to another organization; then in 1995 in exchange for being named Grand Marshal, and $1M donation in 1983 to be Co-Chair and Founding Member of Vietnam Veterans Memorial (dedicated by NYC mayor Ed Koch in 1985), which is built not far from — and thus adding value to — his properties, generating great PR for himself and getting in-kind NYC contracts with tax breaks and expedited construction permits, again using veterans for his own financial benefit... until he needed to use them again recently to justify his ducking out of debate which couldn't improve his position but could very well damage it.

Q.E.I., Q.E.D.

115 posted on 01/31/2016 11:58:37 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Because he is rich, you feel Trump should “give his fair share”? You sound like quite the liberal or Communist, telling everyone else what to do with their money. People should be grateful, but instead Trump giving his own money away isn’t quite good enough for you. Easy for you to criticize. I’m sure you haven’t donated a damn dime.


116 posted on 02/01/2016 12:11:36 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Informative post - thanks!

And a very interesting profile on your member page. Some great quotes. I'd add one - "Money can't buy happiness but it can rent it for a good, long time!" - airborne

For what it's worth, I am supporting Ted Cruz. I just try to support people donating money for veterans. Regardless of their financial motives.

Lots of veterans charities get help from people who just want a tax write-off. Still helps my brothers - and THEY are all I care about. People like Trump will get theirs in the end.

117 posted on 02/01/2016 4:01:10 AM PST by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

Comment #118 Removed by Moderator

To: CutePuppy

Won’t make a wits difference with the Pied Piper’s lemmings as they listen only to the magical flute in their march toward the cliff while trying to drag everyone along to our sorrow.

This evening will tell.

Knowing some of the good people of Iowa, I am impressed with their integrity. I think Branstad made a mistake by claiming all of Iowa was in for the gubmit feed trough.
Iowa corn will sell just as well for food without the ethanol subsidies that only a few get in on.


119 posted on 02/01/2016 5:22:56 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: usteaparty

I guess it will have to be Clinton based on your choices, its hard to chose between two Democrats. I am voting against both.


Yes you are voting with the establishment. And yes you are voting for Clinton. Now go look in the mirror and say “I support Hillary”. Your opinion is a prime example of how the we the people will never break the stranglehold the establishment have on us.


120 posted on 02/01/2016 5:30:08 AM PST by QuigleyDU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson