Posted on 01/30/2016 4:43:51 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Too late for that. U.S. prisons are full of American muslims. And Obama is going to release many of them before he leaves office.
Taking it a little farther down the road, Shoebat and Richardson make a strong case for islam not actually having been newly introduced by Mohammed. They posit that islam is actually Baal/Aphrodite worship repackaged.
US
“But how to make a violent Muslim peaceful?”
A 55 gr jacketed soft point at 3,100 FPS through the brain pan works on individuals and small groups. For large gatherings ionizing radiation and blast over pressures generated by something in the 50 kiloton range would work equally well.
L
BKMK
Well, that’s what I have always thought but I will have to say that as I near the end of Shoebat’s and Richardson’s book I am more open to the possibility that the ultimate battle will be between Israel and islam (Sarah and Hagar).
We need “A Clockwork Orange” for muslims.
As of now, I too see Islam playing a major role. Perhaps even the ultimate role, depending upon what remains after MB/DB is taken out early in the end time scenario I currently envision.
Realistically, given a time frame of 5 years or less, I see Islam as a partner with something like the UN or NATO in the final battle against Israel, and perhaps a Western Remanent of some form or other. I don't think there is time enough for Islam to become the "one world government", though it's well on its way to doing so.
If the US, China, and Russia engage in a major exchange of nuclear weapons (ref: MB destroyed in one hour) then Islam may indeed rise up to become the dominate one world government. I see Islam as uniquely positioned to do so. Contributing will be Indonesia, the world's largest Islamic nation - childhood home of Obama.
Many things are converging now - all pointing toward this period in time as the beginning of a new age, as prophesied - NOT the "end of the world" as so many mistakenly believe.
He suggests that Westerners who study prophecy have a built in bias to see it through Western eyes whereas he sees it through Israeli and muslim eyes.
In his book "God's War on Terror," he sets Biblical prophecy sided by side with the Quran and Hadiths.
They line up perfectly with the Quran and Hadiths being a perverted mirror image of Biblical prophecy.
If you haven't read his book (w/Richardson), check out the reviews at the link above.
It was the reviews that convinced me to read it.
There are a few errors in it as might be expected (for example, he overestimates the size/power of the Turkish military - says it is second only to that of the U.S. - simply not true).
Quite likely. There is excellent Biblical precedent for that as well as the solution.
But of the cities of these peoples which the Lord your God gives you as an inheritance, you shall let nothing that breathes remain alive, but you shall utterly destroy them... just as the Lord your God has commanded you, lest they teach you to do according to all their abominations which they have done for their gods, and you sin against the Lord your God. Deuteronomy 20:16-18
There are many other Biblical references covering this command.
We obviously are choosing to ignore the mortal danger to ourselves and our way of life.
Amen!
I am reminded of that domesticated chimpanzee who lived with a woman in Connecticut for many years; then one day attacked her best friend and ate her face and hand off.
There are a few errors in it as might be expected (for example, he overestimates the size/power of the Turkish military - says it is second only to that of the U.S. - simply not true).
I find he mostly errs when he attempts to push his theory of MB/DB being a country in the M.E. Other than that, I think he has a very good grasp on much of how this may play out to some extent.
No one can know exactly how it will play out, even though many claim to. There's just too much complexity and room for misinterpretation, for a ton of reasons; one being the exact time frame it takes place in. Another is the fact much is hidden for very good reason, by the Almighty himself, to be revealed only at the proper time.
MamaTexan, as you know, I have a lot of respect for your knowledge of Constitutional history. Actually, I think there is a way one can exclude Islam from the social contract, because Islam excludes itself. Consider this argument I've been making for about the last five years:
Frankly, to my mind, to be a Muslim is to renounce one's US citizenship.
It is not a religion. It is a methodology used for subversion and conquest.
Obviously your “caption” is intended sarcastically, but it is informative to keep in mind the tale of Sir Charles James Napier and his position on the Indian practice of suttee.
How would your solution deal with a fanatical jihadist born-and-raised in a historically-Christian Western European country?
See posts 114-115.
You either adhere to it...TOTALLY, or it becomes meaningless.
Yes, this is true.
Allow me to cut through the Gordian Knot on this for you, MamaTexan:
Islam does not recognize the Natural Rights of Man.
The Natural Rights of Man are the foundation and basis of the US Constitution. Since the Muslims don't recognize the Natural Rights of Man, they don't recognize the US Constitution - nor do they recognize the Declaration, either [I'm a Declarationist].
I myself maintain that Muslims cannot be US citizens. Some would say that's an extreme view, but if you pinned any Muslim down on those natty ol' Rights, you'd find your answer. They can't accept the the primacy of the Declaration and the Constitution over their religion.
After this determination, the "question" of their religion is superfluous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.