Remember this?...There's no love lost between these two...
Posted on 01/29/2016 11:31:25 AM PST by BenLurkin
Sounds like a plan.
She is trying to make this a he-said/she-said and characterize the other side as a “Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” again. She basically did that with the IG’s report. It’s going to be even more ridiculous to do that with the State Dept., whose spokeshole just said these were “highly secret, damaging to national security,” and more absurd yet to claim that against the CIA and NSA who are the sources of the classification as I understand this.
VRWC? IG is an Obama appointee!! Does she really think that will fly with anyone?
She tried it! Honest injun, she put that out there.
I’ve have always said she is a screwup but she may just
be far more stupid than I had ever imagined. I’m beginning
to think, with this news, that the emails she deleted
really were personal garbage and she gave thousands of
emails constituting evidence of felonies to the State Dept.
DNC will never let Sanders be the nominee.
How does this election cycle get better?
Is the DNC going to have their convention in Chicago? lol
Wow that sidekick must be really dumb.
He could of done a google search and found how to nuke a HDD.
Problem solved.
Paging Edward Snowden! Tell us what you know! You’re already a wanted man.
I won’t be happy until she is facing life behind bars for her crimes.
That’s when the legal quagmire delays things even more. If it’s too top secret to be released, how do they show it to an insecure grand jury panel? And they can’t even show it to the Judge in camera without super top security clearance. Just my thoughts/questions.
“Why hasn’t she been arrested yet?...”
Clinton knows Obama’s actual background. Obama is instructing the DOJ and others to keep her protected from prosecution. He is doing this because Clinton has the power and inside information to spill the truth about his past and occult (in the sense of hidden, not satanic, although I wouldn’t even rule that out) rise to power. He is afraid of her.
It is mutual blackmail, actually.
Even though they hate each other, they are forced into a “quid pro quo” stand off.
As long as each one’s potential to damage the other remains roughly equal, Obama will protect Clinton and Clinton will keep quiet about the truth of Obama’s past.
So we’re screwed unless we get a very very brave whistleblower insider to come forward. I am not holding my breath, but I do hope for it ...
Remember this?...There's no love lost between these two...
Lately the leaks have been coming faster.
= = =
At what level (you know, green, yellow, red):
Incontinence, or ...
Diarrhea, or ...
Cyclospora infection (explosive diarrhea)
Catherine Herridge takes her work very seriously and she’s excellent at it....
The recent stool from the White House was black. My guess is a lot of internal bleeding.
For the answer to your question look for the recent WashPost article on what happened to Petraeus. He obviously paid a price without being indicted much less a grand jury being involved.
Hillary’s headed down the same road with the exception of her aides. There may be no way they can avoid slammer time. One of them may go for immunity.
Too damaging to Hillary. Lol
That’s how I read it.
She told Greta the investigators were-—herword-—”pissed!”—at Josh Reanest’s response.
I watched that segment and missed that word. lol
Herridge was just on The Kelly File and was even more explicit about the reaction within the FBI and DoJ. Not with salty language but with specific language that “Earnest has no knowledge” of what they’re doing. Not her words, she was quoting sources.
Snowden didn’t have access to SAP documents. He’s wanted for treason for releasing far less damaging information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.