Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: volunbeer

He died as a consequence of his own actions. That is sad.

Was he one of the ones in the video destroying utility security cameras?


45 posted on 01/27/2016 8:38:46 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman

He destroyed security cameras? Well, then execute him.

Are you serious. A cop shoots a kid trying to take his gun that had just robbed a store and the President gets involved. Hands up don’t shoot, ring a bell?


51 posted on 01/27/2016 8:41:12 AM PST by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

“He died as a consequence of his own actions. That is sad.

Was he one of the ones in the video destroying utility security cameras?”

You are saying destruction of property should carry a death sentence with NO charges or trial? Seriously?


52 posted on 01/27/2016 8:42:36 AM PST by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman
He died as a consequence of his own actions. That is sad.

Which actions were those? Putting his hands up? Asking to see the Sheriff?

Do those actions carry a summary death penalty?

67 posted on 01/27/2016 8:50:28 AM PST by agere_contra (Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman; volunbeer
He died as a consequence of his own actions. That is sad.

If you ambush somebody and kill them, it's usually referred to as "first degree murder".

164 posted on 01/27/2016 10:37:42 AM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

“He died as a consequence of his own actions. That is sad.
Was he one of the ones in the video destroying utility security cameras?”

For the sake of discussion, let’s say he was one of those who took down the security camera. That certainly doesn’t seem grounds for getting shot up. Let’s also say, as you imply, that he’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Traditionally, ‘slow’ people in society are given a bit of ‘extra consideration’, such as “that boy ain’t quite right in the head”, there certainly was none of that. It doesn’t matter if what (perhaps) he took down was a utility security camera, or what was possibly a camera being used in surveillance of the protestors. Is either grounds for getting shot up? I firmly think these guys chose the wrong hill, but it seems their very worst offense was taking down a security camera. It also seems his paranoia was founded.


209 posted on 01/27/2016 12:43:29 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

You are a trolly broken record.

Hey, were those cameras madated by ferc/nerc?


259 posted on 01/31/2016 7:57:56 PM PST by T-Bone Texan (The economic collapse is imminent. Buy staple food and OTC meds now, before prices skyrocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson