Wow some of these critics are stupid.
Posted on 01/26/2016 4:35:43 PM PST by presidio9
Tag line.
? Do you have any proof he’s going to build a wall? The man who says things, and says the opposite all the time? The man who never follows through on any of the stuff he spouts?
Both of Trump's main challengers have also promised a wall.
Both are committed to ending the apocalypse of innocents that is has claimed 58,000,000 lives in this country since Roe V Wade.
On a Howard Stern show back in 2003 Trump indicated he wanted to abort his second daughter, Tiffany, after his mistress at the time, Marla Maples, got pregnant.
He told Howard Stern he said to Maples they had to “do something about it”. Luckily for Tiffany, Maples didn’t want to. They got married after the baby was born.
Bingo!
Are you still ready for an Emperor?
Obola won the Nobel Peace Prize by TALKING about Peace. Now, Trump will win the Presidency by TALKING about the Wall.
Talk is cheap.
“Since the 1990s, abortion has become one of the starkest and most consistent lines of demarcation between Democrats and Republicans. “
Says who? Republicans controlled the White House as well as the Congress from 2002 until 2006. What the hell did they accomplish in the fight against abortion? Lip service seems to be about all these people are capable of.
The man who never follows through on any of the stuff he spouts?
********************
Give him a break ,, he’s not president yet... When he is he has the 1986 law on the books where the wall is required to be built... and he has plenty of fat in the executive branch to fund it by re-allocating $$$$ even if it isn’t in the budget.
As to his “conversion” ,,, I am like the writer unconvinced ... but I’ll take a chance on him rather than allow Hillary to win. All he needs to do is sign a personhood bill or appoint constitutionalist judges.
You don’t care that nascent human beings are being slaughtered and their lifeless corpses sold by an evil disgusting organization that is using our tax dollars to do these horrifying things? That’s a disgusting viewpoint to have.
Thanks for posting.
Right now it sure looks like Trump is going to get the nomination. We will know in a couple months. I'm staying with Cruz. I know who he was, I know who he is, and I know who he will be.
Tag line.
You don't care if Hillary isn't defeated? That's a disgusting viewpoint to have.
Hey, who knows maybe Obama will do that as well. There is about as much chance.
“Do you have any proof he’s going to build a wall?”
They ALL lie, and they ALL have checkered pasts on immigration (at best). I’ll go with the one that’s saying what I want to hear, and saying it the strongest.
You're right that his reasons are weak. It should be that life begins at conception and we don't have the authority from our Creator to abort life because it's inconvenient. He is getting closer though as this editorial by Trump on the culture of life reveals.
But there is little he can do as President to stop abortions. He has already promised to cut off funding from Planned Parenthood until they stop abortions. He has already said that abortions shouldn't be funded by tax payer money in violation of the consciences of the tax payers. So I think Trump will do what he can as President to limit abortions and federal funding of abortions.
We need Congress to step up. Until we elect an anti-abortion congress, it's not really a major issue in electing a President.
We need Trump for reasons other than abortion, like the economy and trade negotiations. Cruz is better on abortions, but Cruz is almost a single issue candidate. Trump will probably do everything Cruz can do on abortions and possibly more, since Trump thinks outside the box more than most.
“Both of Trump’s main challengers have also promised a wall.”
Only AFTER seeing Trump succeed by promising, and it’s OBVIOUS that they don’t have their hearts in it.
Not at all, particularly after the GOPe get off the phone with them threatening to withhold their money.
And, yes, I'm aware of the issue of judicial nominees. Don't forget that Supreme Court nominees must go through a Senate confirmation process.
The bottom line is, abortion, at least in some form, is very likely to remain legal in the US, although there may be a trend of more restrictions being placed on it in the future.
At the core of the issue, however, a mother's right to life will always be able to trump that of the fetus.
Thus, even if abortion were to remain legal only in cases where the mother's life is deemed to be at risk, the arbitrary nature of that determination will effectively amount to a loophole that one could drive a truck through.
What I'm saying is that Trump's stance on abortion, and indeed Cruz's, will not make much difference in the long run.
I think we can agree that there will always be exceptions which will allow the procedure to take place, and those exceptions will be sufficient for the procedure, which does take a life, to remain legal for any woman who opts for it.
I think that the real progress to be made against the appalling number of abortions in this country lies in educating women against choosing that option, combined with a stigmatization of abortion by society in general.
Just because something is legal doesn't mean that there's not a stigma attached to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.