Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/22/2016 7:05:26 AM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: simpson96

Trump will change this model big time. In fact on the news this morning, they said Democratic Party would only get 45-48 percent and the formula has only been wrong 3 times since 1960.


2 posted on 01/22/2016 7:07:57 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

“Those results are heavily dependent on how swing states vote.”

i.e., we don’t know.


3 posted on 01/22/2016 7:09:01 AM PST by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Say “Hello” (or is it “Heil”) to President Bernie Sanders! Give it up now - no more arguing about DJT vs Cruz, Establishment vs outsider.

The election is all but wrapped up, we can go on with other things now. Or until Bernie gets into office and shuts down places like FR.


5 posted on 01/22/2016 7:09:36 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

ANY analysis this far out is utterly meaningless.


6 posted on 01/22/2016 7:09:39 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
Moody's is owned by Warren Buffett and Bershire Hathaway.


7 posted on 01/22/2016 7:11:48 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

The proper title for the results of Moody’s analytics should have been “Too Close to Call.” So, to say the Dems win it is politicizing the results of the analytics.


9 posted on 01/22/2016 7:13:35 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

While the dems own a structural advantage (guaranteed 240 EVs), their margin of victory won’t be that high. It’ll be closer than 2008 and 2012.


10 posted on 01/22/2016 7:15:23 AM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
From the article: "So far, the strength of the economy has kept the model on track for the Democratic nominee."

Strength of the economy? Really?

I thought the sucky economy was the #1 issue for Democrats.

11 posted on 01/22/2016 7:17:03 AM PST by TontoKowalski (Satisfied Customer #291)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I agree with the author but for different reasons. The Democrats have a built in advantage because the population centers are all or mostly all heavily Democrat. That in itself gives them about 230-240 electoral votes going in. Then given the Republicans propensity to eat their own, I see many many voters simply not bothering to vote this year.
Early in 2015, the frontrunners were telling us what they wanted to do if elected. Since Thanksgiving, it seems all we have heard is how awful their opponents are. Cruzers hate anything and everything Trump. Trumpsters hate anything and every thing Cruz. Change the names to Rubio, Bush and Kasich and it is just as bad or worse.
I am starting to think this country could even elect a Bernie Sanders at this point.


12 posted on 01/22/2016 7:17:14 AM PST by Tupelo (Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
Those results are heavily dependent on how swing states vote. The latest model from Moody's reflects razor-thin margins in the five most important swing states - Florida, Ohio, Colorado, New Hampshire and Virginia.

Well we might as well just cancel the general election and only hold the vote in the swing states. It would save a lot of time and money in our 40 or so red flyover states and the east and left coast that is guaranteed to be blue.

13 posted on 01/22/2016 7:18:21 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Silly people think old rules apply. Which Democrat a Communist or a Felon will beat Trump?


14 posted on 01/22/2016 7:18:43 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
So what is to worry about for them? Why spend energy attacking Trump or Cruz? They need only win the two smallest or any one of the three larger swing states to get get over the finish line:


18 posted on 01/22/2016 7:29:00 AM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Moody’s...the same folks who rated subprimes as AAA. Hoo-kay!


20 posted on 01/22/2016 7:31:41 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

“Florida, Ohio, Colorado, New Hampshire and Virginia”
There is some truth here.
Cruz would loose every one of these states except for maybe CO.

Trump easily could pickup every one except for maybe Virginia plus pickup NV, IA and MI


23 posted on 01/22/2016 7:48:23 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

If so, the greatest ammo shortage in US history will start in November.


25 posted on 01/22/2016 8:03:18 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson