Replies

I will post to you if your statements warrant a public refutation. If you wish to complain to the moderator, you may do so.

Peace,

You misunderstand. You may of course refute my statements. I have no problem with that, it is your right. What I am offering and suggesting is that you may do so (and I prefer you do so) without notifying me. I know the usual rule is to "ping" or post to a person you disagree with. I am telling you that between you and I, when you talk about me, I waive the rule.

That's all .. just change the name in the "to" line from "cboldt" to "All" or something. If you think it helps your reader, you may, in your reply, says something like "cboldt is wrong because ..."

I am not going to engage in any substantive dialog with you. I do not want to associate with you. I hold you in contempt. I would like you to please respect that. I mean you no harm, I wish you no ill.

I want to add a few more remarks, along the lines of our PM exchange. My contempt for you is limited to a chatroom forum. As a person, I love you, as the Bible teaches us to love our fellow man. You and I likely agree on many things, and almost certainly agree on matters of importance. I do not want you to think that my contempt is toward you as a person, it is not. I believe that should we ever meet in person, it would be a time of fun, sometimes spirited disagreement, but nothing so important that we would distance ourselves. And when we meet in the hereafter, we will laugh about our earthly concerns.