[Cboldt]

You misunderstand. You may of course refute my statements. I have no problem with that, it is your right. What I am offering and suggesting is that you may do so (and I prefer you do so) without notifying me. I know the usual rule is to "ping" or post to a person you disagree with. I am telling you that between you and I, when you talk about me, I waive the rule.

That's all .. just change the name in the "to" line from "cboldt" to "All" or something. If you think it helps your reader, you may, in your reply, says something like "cboldt is wrong because ..."

I am not going to engage in any substantive dialog with you. I do not want to associate with you. I hold you in contempt. I would like you to please respect that. I mean you no harm, I wish you no ill.

[Idaho_Cowboy]

Wow didn't know you could be so opened minded regrading fellow FReepers. Guess you opinion is settle law er science or something.

[Springfield Reformer]

I am sorry, but no, it is disrespectful to those trying to follow a line of argument, as I have done myself many times. If you say things that seem to need refutation or response, and it is to your statement I am responding, then to you I will respond. Again, if you think at any point I go over the edge of proper public discourse, ping the moderator. I will try to keep it to a minimum.

Peace,

SR

[csivils]

I have a question, I’m not going to argue. I honestly wish to know your answer:

What happens if Senator Cruz wins the nomination and then loses a NBC court challenge? (Is the answer different after the election). My understanding is that the party still won and we would still get a Republican president. Would it be the VP, or could the GOPe get its dream of president Yeb! Or something else altogether?