'That has absolutely no place in our democracy and in our politics and we should all stand up and say that loudly and clearly.'Hitlery is just speaking in coded language about the destruction of the First Amendment and creation of a single party state. Anyone who would vote for her supports both of those goals.
‘That has absolutely no place in our democracy and in our politics and we should all stand up and say that loudly and clearly.’
Oh yes, I can recall clearly her indignant rage over the inappropriateness of “Bush=Hitler!”, “Chimpy McBush Hitler”, the “Chimp-in-Chief”, etc. Was she furious!!! /s;)
The mind reels.
"...As a student of the left, Jamie Glazov, has observed in an article about the middle-class defenders of recently captured Seventies terrorist Kathy Soliah:"if you can successfully camouflage your own pathology and hatred with a concern for the 'poor' and the 'downtrodden,' then there will always be a 'progressive' milieu to support and defend you." Huey Newton, George Jackson, Bernadine Dohrn, Sylvia Baraldini, Rubin Carter, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Rigoberta Menchu and innumerable others have all discovered this principle in the course of their criminal careers.....
.....To feel anointed. In other words: To be progressive is itself the most satisfying narcissism.
That is why it is of little concern to them that their socialist schemes have run aground, burying millions of human beings in their wake. That is why they don't care that their panaceas have caused more human suffering than all the injustices they have ever challenged. That is why they never learn from their "mistakes." That is why the continuance of Them is more important than any truth.
If you were active in the so-called "peace" movement or in the radical wing of the civil rights causes, why would you tell the truth? Why would you tell people that no, you weren't really a "peace activist," except in the sense that you were against America's war. Why would you draw attention to the fact that while you called yourselves "peace activists," you didn't oppose the Communists' war, and were gratified when America's enemies won?
What you were really against was not war at all, but American "imperialism" and American capitalism. What you truly hated was America's democracy, which you knew to be a "sham" because it was controlled by money in the end. That's why you wanted to "Bring the Troops Home," as your slogan said. Because if America's troops came home, America would lose and the Communists would win. And the progressive future would be one step closer."...... June 2000 - David Horowitz on Hillary Clinton
Okay, so which one of you has misplaced the Conservo-publican Decoder Ring?