Posted on 01/14/2016 9:10:54 PM PST by Helicondelta
Dang,just dang.
cant argue with that.
Bork taught the Clintons?
Not much of an influence he had on them.
What Tribe omits is that even originalists believe that the constitution can be amended. Any idea of women not being full citizens was clearly amended out of the constitution by the 14th and then 19th Amendments. So, the idea that any Originalist would say that men could pass on their citizenship to their children but not women is laughable and is simply Tribe trying to make us sound sexist.
Freepers rarely really discuss the issue
They just throw bombs
Has anyone here studied the 1790 act where the term natural born citizen is used the only time ever by the founders
It clearly states the father has to be a citizen to be natural born if the child is born abroad
It’s not just liberals thinking we need clarification
And I like Cruz
Or Trump
I think no question Cruz is most originalist conservative
But this is really our first test case and the originalist viewpoint begs questions
And it’s being ignored
The Dems won’t ignore it trust me
Romney....both parents US citizens
McCain ditto and maybe born on us soil in Panama
Goldwater born on US territory
Folks are just shouting over this even Levin....never really explains what changed since 1790
.............” March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, but specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.” It specifies that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term.[1][2]......... “
The circular firing squad revs it up, Trump vs Cruz. Another liberal success story.
I missed the first part of the debate. Did Cruz claim that it didn’t matter what Tribe says because he is a Hillary supporter?
If this is what Cruz said it sounds like he shouldn’t have because it’s not true. Why do that? Cruz is sounding very flaky.
The other thing is regarding the birther issue - Did Cruz claim that Trump wouldn’t be eligible because Trump’s mother wasn’t a citizen? Did Trump’s mother not become a citizen?
Apparently Cruz’s own description of a natural born citizen was 2 citizen parents and born on the soil. Of course that had to be before he thought he might get into the WH.
Tribe served as a law clerk to Mathew Tobriner on the California Supreme Court from 1966â67 and as a law clerk to Potter Stewart of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1967â68. He joined the Harvard Law School faculty as an assistant professor in 1968, receiving tenure in 1972. Among his law students and research assistants while on the faculty at Harvard have been Barack Obama (a research assistant for two years), Chief Justice John Roberts (as a law student in his classes), and Elena Kagan (as a research assistant).
In 1978 he published the first version of what has become one of the core texts on the subject, American Constitutional Law. It has since been updated and expanded a number of times
In 2005, a man I know VERY well, was becoming a Naturalized citizen. The government handed out study guides, to those about to take the Naturalization test. This man aced the test and was THRILLED to be an American citizen. His wife happened to be preggers, at the time and he was very excited that his son ( they knew the sex of the baby and yes, his wife is a NBC ) would now be able to be president if he wanted to run.
So I have known about this since then and posted this stuff, when Obama was in the primaries.
Factual truth is obviously beyond your ken.
Hey NOOB, why the hell are you posting strange tweets from “Progressives”? We don’t care what the ‘RATS think.
Lawrence Tribe is a partisan and not well acquainted with the truth.
Cruz cared enough to name drop him. Now he’s part of the national debate. Complain to Teddy, not freepers.
Cruz cared enough to name drop him. Now he’s part of the national debate.
****************************************************************************
Well NOOB...why don’t you post a link to what specifically Cruz said? Or would you prefer some disjointed, strange tweet by a ‘RAT?
He has one thing right, at least.
You didn’t see the debate? You need to catch up dude.
Neither are YOU familiar with what our government considers a NBC to be; though they ignored all of this re wee barry.
You're the very confused n00b !
I thought Alan Dershowitz was Cruz’s law professor?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.