Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coal Ash Is [100 times] More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste
Scientific American ^ | December 13, 2007 | Mara Hvistendahl

Posted on 01/14/2016 5:04:56 PM PST by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: sparklite2

“so something one hundred times not zero is still something.”

Indeed. but somehow SA’s “one hundred times greater” doesn’t seem quite as significant when you realize it’s 100 times greater than almost nothing.


21 posted on 01/14/2016 5:26:09 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Remember all those steam locomotives? They didn’t all burn anthracite.


22 posted on 01/14/2016 5:26:13 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grundle

A technically correct statement, but not provided any perspective, so as to be deliberately misleading for propaganda purposes.

Sort of like when the surgeon general says “there is no ‘safe’ amount of cigarette smoke”.


23 posted on 01/14/2016 5:26:21 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

So environmental objections to nuclear power, which has been said to be utterly stupid from the beginning, turns out to be, well, utterly stupid.

And of course, we must act now to prevent global cooling...warming...cooling...change.


24 posted on 01/14/2016 5:27:28 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Cinder blocks used to be cheaper when they were made from flyash.


25 posted on 01/14/2016 5:30:11 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x_plus_one

No.

Windmills kill more people every year than has nuclear power. Ever.


26 posted on 01/14/2016 5:31:10 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grundle
If we're worried about it, we need to refine the thorium from the coal, and then make liquid fuel from the coal squeezins.

The Germans used the Fischer-Tropsch process in WWII, and we actually built a plant near St. Louis after the war to test the technology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer%E2%80%93Tropsch_process

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer%E2%80%93Tropsch_process#History

27 posted on 01/14/2016 5:34:02 PM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Oak Ridge Lab Coal Combustion Report

The fact that coal-fired power plants throughout the world are the major sources of radioactive materials released to the environment has several implications. It suggests that coal combustion is more hazardous to health than nuclear power and that it adds to the background radiation burden even more than does nuclear power. It also suggests that if radiation emissions from coal plants were regulated, their capital and operating costs would increase, making coal-fired power less economically competitive.

background on the author

Dr. Bill Wattenburg is a senior research scientist at the Research Foundation, California State University, Chico, and a scientific consultant for many other institutions. Earlier, he was a nuclear weapons designer at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; a member of the US Air Force Scientific Advisory Board; and a UC Berkeley professor of electrical engineering. He was co-founder of Berkeley Scientific Laboratories with Dr. Donald Glaser (Nobel Prize, Physics, 1960).
http://wattenburg.us/techreports.html


28 posted on 01/14/2016 5:34:05 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><> GO CRUZ!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Facts please? Manmade global warming is not a scientist fact. I don’t care how many government sponsered scientists, movie stars, and liberal politicians says it is so. At best, it is a liberal desire that cannot be proven.


29 posted on 01/14/2016 5:34:10 PM PST by robert14 (cng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

http://wattenburg.us/index.html

link for:

Oak Ridge Lab Coal Combustion Report


30 posted on 01/14/2016 5:35:29 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><> GO CRUZ!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I remember when libs were having apoplexy about Coleman lantern mantles being radioactive.

Then there was RADON in the soil!
Then there was stray voltage from power lines!

I’ve worked around power plant fly ash for thirty one years. Still here! The only thing radioactive in the power plants were the “See-Coal” monitors to monitor coal flow.

The company chemical analysis of the ash showed it to be totally inert.

Once a local city began a paving project of all their dirt streets using bottom ash as a base. Some old busy-body in town came down with a head cold in the middle of Summer and began to blame it on the bottom ash dust, so the city ceased paving the streets to get her quiet.

There are still dirt streets in town because of her.


31 posted on 01/14/2016 5:36:40 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

In writing to persuade, I’ve found that
it’s not what you say but what they assume
that counts. :)


32 posted on 01/14/2016 5:37:20 PM PST by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Somebody been hittin’ da happy smoke.


33 posted on 01/14/2016 5:38:00 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Being an American isn't a piece of paper from the State Department. It's an attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

In the 1970’s I was on a Nuclear Submarine out of Groton Conn. There was an anthracite coal burning electric plant up stream. Sometimes, in port, the air particulate radiation detectors would go off, and we would have to don emergency breathing apparatus. The Duty Officer would send the Engineering Laboratory Technician up on the pier to take an air sample. If the sample came back with the half life of decay products of radon gas, we could take off our mask. The radiation was “natural” and even though it was above the levels allowed to be breathed if it came from our reactor we were allowed to breath it.


34 posted on 01/14/2016 5:39:23 PM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robert14

That is a very good point! I started reading SA back in the early 70’s when I was a kid. My, how they’ve fallen.


35 posted on 01/14/2016 5:39:29 PM PST by TruthFactor (Tag-free, for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“St Louis is the poster child of what can go wrong with safely disposed atomic waste years after its ‘safe’ disposal. The Manhattan Project waste is there and is next to an underground burning landfill. Once released into the atmosphere, there will be a dead zone in the US bigger than that of Chernobyl.”

Our government: 0 for 2!

How is Gitmo going? Make that 0 for 3.
How is that Iran Treaty going? Make that 0 for 4. [Is that why they call him Zero?]


36 posted on 01/14/2016 5:39:33 PM PST by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

37 posted on 01/14/2016 5:41:04 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Correct. Coleman Lantern mantles ARE radioactive (Th323)
In fact, the Radioactive Boyscout managed to create U233 and U232 by bombarding Coleman mantles.

Nearly killed him with the Gamma coming off U232


38 posted on 01/14/2016 5:42:08 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: x_plus_one

What about the natural nuclear reactor in Gabon, Africa?

Then there is that giant nuclear reactor that crosses the sky every day and continually showers the earth with radiation.


39 posted on 01/14/2016 5:42:22 PM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Oh no...now the Iranians will be making bombs out of the fly ash.


40 posted on 01/14/2016 5:42:37 PM PST by FrankR (You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson