Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

See Answer Reporter Gets When He Asks State Dept Spox Point Blank if U.S. Sold Cuba Hellfire Missile
The Blaze ^ | Jan 8 2016 | Tré Goins-Phillips

Posted on 01/11/2016 8:15:12 PM PST by Whenifhow

One day after the Wall Street Journal revealed that a dummy U.S. hellfire missile was mistakenly shipped from Europe to Cuba in 2014, the State Department refuses to deny whether or not it was sold to the Cuban government.

"I am restricted, under federal law and regulations, from commenting on the specific defense trade, licensing cases and compliance matters," State Department spokesman John Kirby said during a press conference Friday.

"What I can say is under the Arms Export Control Act, the State Department licenses both permanent and temporary exports by U.S. companies of regulated defense articles," Kirby added.

The State Department spokesman went on to say that it is U.S. companies that are responsible for documenting their shipping logistics and are responsible for reporting any shipping deviations to the federal government. Previous reports indicated that Lockheed has been attributed with the shipping error that lead to the improper shipment.

When pressed for more detail, Kirby said he's "not at liberty to comment further." But that did not stop reporters from pressing the official on the issue.

"You're not suggesting that you actually sold this to the Cubans?" one reporter asked Kirby. "I don't understand why you can't say, 'No, we didn't sell this to the Cubans, it got there by accident by mistake.'"

"You want to leave open the possibility that our government sold or gave a hellfire missile, intentionally, to the government of Cuba?" the reporter continued, seemingly agitated.

The missile, now allegedly in Cuban possession, did not contain explosives, according to the Journal, but there are concerns over the potential for the Cubans to share the defense technology with U.S. adversaries like North Korea or Russia.

U.S. officials have been urging the Cuban government to return the missile. In addition, the U.S. government is reportedly investigating whether or not the missile's disappearance was an intentional act of espionage.

The United States and Cuba restored diplomatic relations in July 2015 after more than 50 years of hostility.

Watch the exchange below:

1:37 Minutes State Department Will Not Deny That U.S. Sold Hellfire Missile to Cuba

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXv3MfO6ffk


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cuba; espionage; missile; statedept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Whenifhow
In addition, the U.S. government is reportedly investigating whether or not the missile's disappearance was an intentional act of espionage.

That would mean the 'government' would have to investigate 'itself'.

21 posted on 01/11/2016 9:51:58 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Cuba "donated' a bazillion bucks to the Clinton Foundation...

Oh come on.... don't be ridiculous.

It wasn't a 'bazillion'.

22 posted on 01/11/2016 9:53:13 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

think about it. a US missile is in cuba, in cuban hands.

do you actually think there is some arbitrary way for military tech to ‘get on a plane’ and accidentally end up in cuba??

we have no military shipments to cuba, except for those going specifically to Guantanamo.

therefore, if a US missile is in cuban hands... it was either:

a. stolen from gitmo
b. delivery from gitmo into their custody
c. flown directly to a location of their choosing

option A is the only one that doesn’t involve TREASON.

so the question should be... WAS IT STOLEN OR NOT ?


23 posted on 01/11/2016 10:00:58 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

WTF OVER?!


24 posted on 01/11/2016 10:22:56 PM PST by WTFOVR (I find myself exclaiming that expression quite often these days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

More treason. It never stops.


25 posted on 01/11/2016 11:03:31 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Time for the firing squad to take some serious target practice.


26 posted on 01/12/2016 12:26:11 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bkmk


27 posted on 01/12/2016 2:34:17 AM PST by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Wow, you can see Kirby trying not to break out in a full grin. Bastard !

Who is the reporterette?

28 posted on 01/12/2016 2:44:03 AM PST by csvset ( Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Uhhh... lets see a drone mistakenly flew into Iran,we left a stealth chopper in abbottobman when we killed OBL’s double and now a hellfire mistakenly is shipped to Cuba,what else has happened that we don’t know about?????


29 posted on 01/12/2016 2:52:21 AM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
"Don't hold your breath waiting for the Congressional Republicans to prosecute."

What an idiotic statement. Congress has no prosecutorial powers, only the Justice Department does. Here you have the Democrats and Obama caught red handed in at least gross incompetence, and maybe a lot more, and all you can do is whine and cry about Republicans? Crawl back in your hole!

30 posted on 01/12/2016 4:48:15 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: csvset

Don’t know who the lady reporter is, but the fellow is the AP reporter, Matt Lee.

AP reporter GRILLS State Dept on whether Iran has come clean yet on past nuclear program

Read more: http://therightscoop.com/ap-reporter-grills-state-dept-on-whether-iran-has-come-clean-yet-on-past-nuclear-program/#ixzz3x20b5s6d


31 posted on 01/12/2016 5:19:25 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
What an idiotic statement. Congress has no prosecutorial powers, only the Justice Department does. Here you have the Democrats and Obama caught red handed in at least gross incompetence, and maybe a lot more, and all you can do is whine and cry about Republicans? Crawl back in your hole!

Fall asleep in civics class, did we? LOL!

See: Impeachment

The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House's impeachment action.

Now, you may be happy to have Congressional Republicans sitting on their hands instead of their sworn duty, but I prefer to hold their feet to the fire.

32 posted on 01/12/2016 7:30:35 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker (...and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many... Daniel 8:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

You didn’t say “impeach” or “prosecute”, you said “prosecute”. Words mean things. I didn’t have to go to a civics class to learn that, I learned it in Kindergarten.


33 posted on 01/12/2016 7:34:23 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
You didn't say "impeach" or "prosecute", you said "prosecute". Words mean things. I didn't have to go to a civics class to learn that, I learned it in Kindergarten.

Fall asleep in English class, did we? LOL!

I didn't say, "impeach" or "prosecute," I said "prosecute?"

Yes, I agree. Words mean things. So far, you're spewing gibberish.

34 posted on 01/12/2016 7:40:51 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker (...and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many... Daniel 8:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
What Bill Clinton did was transfer authority on restricted defense transactions from DOD to Commerce to get around the ban on def tech to China, repaying Chinese funding of his election.

Wow.

35 posted on 01/12/2016 7:46:18 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/11/world/clinton-approves-technology-transfer-to-china.html

These articles barely scratch the surface. It’s treason, campaign finance illegality, and bribery all the way down.


36 posted on 01/12/2016 10:43:37 AM PST by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

OK, OK, maybe a few million...


37 posted on 01/12/2016 11:44:39 AM PST by GOPJ (Trump's living rent-free in Jeb's head - Trump's wearing a robe and comfy slippers. FlickLives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

The fact that the correct answer is “No, we did not sell that missile to Cuba.” just tells me everything I need to know about this administration.


38 posted on 01/12/2016 12:34:30 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
In November of 2016 Obama is planning to be in South America yukking it up with his communist buddies, spiking the ball in our faces about the COMMUNIST portion of the communist-Islamist alliance that put him in power.

Really?

The other day you had him camped out under the White House for a few years.

You need to get your fiction straight, if for no other reason than continuity.

Seriously.. when Obama is gone what will you base your fan-fiction stuff on?

There' s vampires and Yu-Gi-Oh and Harry Potter...

I'm betting you could come up with all kinds of stuff on Harry Potter.

39 posted on 01/12/2016 4:07:33 PM PST by humblegunner (NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson