Congress moves to endorse Islamic blasphemy laws

American Thinker ^ | December 31, 2015 | Carol Brown

[artichokegrower]

There is a bill before Congress (HR569) that singles out hate speech against Muslims. And then some. As of this writing, the resolution, which is nothing short of sharia law, has 82 co-sponsors. All of them are Democrats.

[artichokegrower]

Wonder what's going to happen in liberal land when the Muslim lobby hits heads with the gay lobby and the women's rights lobby.

[bray]

They are endorsing the real war on women.

Pray America wakes

[WENDLE]

What happened the the Blasphemy of the real God law. What a load of crap.

[artichokegrower]

Don’t harass Muslims because of their faith. Save that for Christian bakers who won’t make cakes for gay weddings.

[conservativejoy]

Going nowhere. Entirely unconstitutional.

[sport]

Come voting time, enough Republicans will vote for it so that it passes. Ditto the Senate.

[WENDLE]

I’m Sorry. You are sooo right.

[Tench_Coxe]

This could be the seed of a very devastating commercial against Democrats during the election season, if crafted appropriately

[Rebel_Ace]

First Amendment - Religion and Expression. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I believe this should be the end of the matter, but, hey, what do I know? I'm just a stupid voter.

[cuban leaf]

Christians don’t exercise hate speech against muslims. They exercise their right to free speech when they expose ISLAM for the evil it is. And they exercise their free speech rights when they condemn the ACTIONS of others, as opposed to the person committing the action.

If the person happens to be muslim, well, so be it.

[alloysteel]

What does “Constitutional” got to do with the Current Regime?

That ship has sailed. Even “legal” does not mean much of anything any more.

[Jim Robinson]

Totally unconstitutional and otherwise treasonous.

[WhiskeyX]

These Democrats need to be impeached for violating their oath and duty to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, including the unconstitutional Sharia Law.

[SkyDancer]

Have you ever wondered why it’s OK to make jokes about Catholics, the Pope, Jews, Christians, the Irish, the Italians, the Polish, the Chinese, the French (including French Canadians), the elderly, bad golfers, men/women , blacks/whites, etc, but its insensitive to make jokes about Muslims? Time to level the playing field and be politically correct by including the Muslims!

[A_perfect_lady]

All 82 should be tried for treason.

[TigersEye]

Is this about that psychopathic goat-humping pedophile MoHamHead?

[Moonman62]

There is a bill before Congress (HR569) that singles out hate speech against Muslims. And then some. As of this writing, the resolution, which is nothing short of sharia law, has 82 co-sponsors. All of them are Democrats.

...

Muslims are executing homosexuals and the Democrats don’t care. Christians won’t bake a cake for a gay wedding and get ruined.

Something’s not right.

[rockrr]

The left is kowtowing to the muzzies - what else would one expect? This should fail on party line votes. If it doesn’t then anyone voted for it should be beheaded.

(just kidding ((or am I?)))

[Menehune56]

Have you ever wondered why it’s OK to make jokes about Catholics, the Pope, Jews, Christians, the Irish, the Italians, the Polish, the Chinese, the French (including French Canadians), the elderly, bad golfers, men/women , blacks/whites, etc, but its insensitive to make jokes about Muslims?

[plain talk]

FU Mohammed and your fellow goat-humpers