Skip to comments.
National Suicide? Nobody Knows Who Obama Is!
Freedom Outpost ^
| 12/13/2015
| Bradlee Dean
Posted on 12/13/2015 5:49:02 AM PST by HomerBohn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: HomerBohn
This quote came from the Czech Republic, and I think it one of the best:
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
41
posted on
12/13/2015 8:25:12 AM PST
by
patriot08
(4th geneneration Texan (girl type))
To: patriot08
42
posted on
12/13/2015 8:26:54 AM PST
by
sport
To: HomerBohn; All
There were websites out there who tried to warn us about Obama as soon as he announced his candidacy (such as the excellent
‘The Obama File)
http://www.theobamafile.com/indexArchive.html
but nobody listened.
The United States
Library of Congress
has selected
TheObamaFile.com
for inclusion in its
historic collection
of Internet materials
43
posted on
12/13/2015 8:47:26 AM PST
by
patriot08
(4th geneneration Texan (girl type))
To: 2banana
Stop drinking the koolaid.
44
posted on
12/13/2015 8:52:13 AM PST
by
bgill
(CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: sport
You are right, both parties participated in the usurpation
45
posted on
12/13/2015 9:17:56 AM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Islamophobia? It is not irrational to fear evil)
To: austingirl
Here's a picture to mull over. His half brother Mark's site used to have this picture of Mark (right) and a little boy (left) he claimed was another brother, David Opiyo Obama. Opiyo means first born of twins. Hussein means one who confronts or destroyer.
46
posted on
12/13/2015 9:20:07 AM PST
by
bgill
(CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: patriot08
You’re right. It is one of the best and I think the now deceased president of the Czech Republic said it.
47
posted on
12/13/2015 9:23:39 AM PST
by
HomerBohn
(Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
To: Ron/GA
This hasn’t much to do with the thread, but do you know what is the best combination health care and prescription plan for oldsters?
48
posted on
12/13/2015 9:28:48 AM PST
by
HomerBohn
(Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
To: HomerBohn
Why has no one DEMANDED to see his SEALED college records! Was he listed as a foreign student? Did he really travel to Pakistan during those yrs when Americans weren’t allowed to?
49
posted on
12/13/2015 9:33:01 AM PST
by
Ms Mable
(w)
To: Ms Mable
Yes, yes, yes.
All of it is true. Obama is a fictitious, lying communist mau mau!
50
posted on
12/13/2015 9:39:14 AM PST
by
HomerBohn
(Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
To: HomerBohn
Seriously, I don’t know who or what he is....I’d just like to have the “sealed” facts.
51
posted on
12/13/2015 9:42:08 AM PST
by
Ms Mable
(w)
To: sport
We did not lose it. It was freely given away. On November 4, 2008 a revolution occurred. The Republican Party helped. The media aided and abetted. And the votes of the parasites, American haters, traitors, fools, and idiots made it happen. None other than that Great Republican, One John Sydney McCain said that we[the Nation] had nothing to fear from an Obama administration. Or words to that effect. Sarah Palin fought valiantly but was soon weighed down from the weight of Republican knives in her back. And last but not least, that Great Republican, Karl Rove, who many had previously affectionately referred to as, âRove, You Magnificent Bastardâ, did his part in the demise of Sarah. Very well said.
52
posted on
12/13/2015 10:16:32 AM PST
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: patriot08
Sub to tagline
“leave us alone to live our lives in peace and we’ll get along fine, if that is not satisfactory, we’ll deal with it.”
—
One of my ancestors fought in the Revolutionary War, another was born in Texas during the Republic of Texas.
The one who was born in the Republic of Texas fought in the civil war. When the war ended he was in a prison camp in NY. He walked home to Texas.
My family has owned/operated farms in this county since 1889. It is home. (Wife & I were away for 25 years, back since 1995)
53
posted on
12/13/2015 11:08:46 AM PST
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: Liz; Old Sarge; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; freeangel; kalee; TWhiteBear; Salvation; ...
Old news is new again.
National Suicide? Nobody Knows Who Obama Is!
Ping to Article and comments... esp # 27 by Liz.
Q20: Are Social Security numbers reused after a person dies?
A: No. We do not reassign a Social Security number (SSN) after the number holder's death. Even though we have issued over 453 million SSNs so far, and we assign about 5 and one-half million new numbers a year, the current numbering system will provide us with enough new numbers for several generations into the future with no changes in the numbering system.
https://www.ssa.gov/history/hfaq.html
54
posted on
12/13/2015 2:16:07 PM PST
by
LucyT
To: LucyT; Liz; All
We do not reassign a Social Security number (SSN) after the number holder's death. Even though we have issued over 453 million SSNs so far, and we assign about 5 and one-half million new numbers a year, the current numbering system will provide us with enough new numbers for several generations into the future with no changes in the numbering system. That piece of "information" from the Social Security web site isn't quite accurate. A few years ago, the numbering system for NEW cards was changed, so that the first three digits of a NEW SSN no longer indicate the specific state (or DC or territory or commonwealth) in which the recipient resided when the SSN was issued. But that change in the numbering system would have no bearing on the SSN which Obama purports to have received decades ago.
To: justiceseeker93
The obama government changed the Social Security numbering system deliberately to further hide obama’s false identity.
Probably changed with a direct order from ValJar or the Moocher.
56
posted on
12/13/2015 2:48:46 PM PST
by
LucyT
To: LucyT; All
The Obama government changed the Social Security numbering system deliberately to further hide obamaâs false identity. That new change wouldn't be relevant to the SSN Obama claimed for himself that was issued in CT to another man. For Obama to use that SSN doesn't pass the smell test, because we know how the previous SSN issuing system worked. The new wrinkle is just a "red herring" in the Obama SSN discussion.
To: justiceseeker93
Everyone on FR is well aware it wouldn’t be relevant to obama, and also know it was done to confuse uninformed voters.
58
posted on
12/13/2015 4:23:29 PM PST
by
LucyT
To: LucyT; All
The Obama government changed the Social Security numbering system deliberately to further hide obamaâs false identity. That new change wouldn't be relevant to the SSN Obama claimed for himself that was issued in CT to another man. For Obama to use that Connecticut SSN doesn't pass the smell test, because we know how the previous SSN issuing system worked. The introduction of the new SSN issuing system is nothing more than a "red herring" in relation to the discussion of the issue of Obama's use of a false identity.
To: LucyT; All
...it was done to confuse uninformed voters. "Uninformed voters"? Let's not pull any punches here. Anyone that freakin' dumb that can't understand this issue shouldn't be voting, period.
And, speaking of that, how many of the Obama votes in 2008 and especially 2012 were illegal, cast by individuals ineligible to vote, cast by individuals voting more than once, fabricated by electronic chicanery in vote counting, etc., etc.? Enough to spell the difference in enough battleground states to turn the election to Zero when a completely fair election procedure would have theoretically meant defeat for him? You have to wonder.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson