Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Obama and Hillary be disqualified from office for being on a “Terror watch list”?
12/1/2015

Posted on 12/01/2015 11:40:16 AM PST by Torcert

Should Obama be impeached and removed from office for being on a Terror watch list?
With terrorism in the news the Democratic national socialist party has once again trotted out one of it's perennially favorite scams: The "terror watch list" issue.

They have few concerns about the importation of terrorist 'Refugees' [and future illegal Democratic voters] and the down play the threat of ISIS (Daesh) but suddenly become agitated over the possibility of using those issues against their enemies. Yes, there nothing like a serious crisis that can be used for crass political gain to energize the Democratic national socialist party, and the so-called "terror watch lists" are no excerption.

Their cause celeb in this case it to demand that people on the so-called "terror watch lists" be deprived of their commonsense civil rights - primarily the second amendment. Strip away the cynical rhetoric and it should be obvious that this is a golden opportunity to pretend to be tough on terrorism while trying to implement gun control at the same time.

It's a win-win both ways for the socialists - if voted down they have an instant excuse for terrorist attacks they’ve brought on. And if approved they have now have a weapon with which they can assault their political opponents.

For they are incessantly tarring Gun owners and the NRA with the pejorative of "terrorists" so it is easy to see how they can implement an instant gun ban by these means. And it's not like the nation's socialists would use an government agency to oppress their opponents - if your ignore the IRS abuse of Tea Party groups and other outrages.

But let's look at this another way and apply it to national socialist leaders Obama and Hillary.

The gun grabbers would like to deprive those on the secret Terror watch lists of their civil rights without due process or legal recourse. Could it be said that if inclusion on the lists disqualifies one as "too dangerous" to own a gun or fly then the same could be said for holding high office.

What's that you say?
..........Removing Obama and disqualifying Hillary would be unconstitutional ......
....so would depriving the people of their Commonsense Civil rights so "what difference would it make" (to coin a phrase)

The Democratic National Socialist party will do "Whatever it takes" to deprive the people of their Commonsense Civil rights ranging from outright lies to the Terror watch list scam. So why can't the people do the same to protect the country and freedom from the likes of Obama and Hillary?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: banglist; communism; communists; economics; hillary; obama; socialism; terrorism; terrorist; terrorwatchlist; tyranny
Their past actions should easily 'qualify' Obama and Hillary to the Terror watch list.

Therefore should they be 'disqualified' for office..

1 posted on 12/01/2015 11:40:16 AM PST by Torcert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Torcert

Yes.


2 posted on 12/01/2015 11:42:06 AM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

:-)
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander..


3 posted on 12/01/2015 11:43:53 AM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Torcert

That is very well thought out.

You should hire a lawyer and file against Obama and Hillary in Federal Court.


4 posted on 12/01/2015 11:59:44 AM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

We shouldn’t have to - were the Nation’s Socialists to succeed in their wish about the TWLs people would be deprived of their Commonsense Civil rights by a due-process free edict.

Such should be the same for Hillary and Obama - they should be deprived or disqualified from office without the niceties of due process.


5 posted on 12/01/2015 12:03:57 PM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Torcert

Wishful thinking beyond imagination.


6 posted on 12/01/2015 12:05:38 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

The point is that people have to realize the danger in the nation’s socialists doing ‘whatever it takes’ to deprive the people of their rights.

That alone should disqualify Hillary and Obama from office.


7 posted on 12/01/2015 12:10:58 PM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Torcert

How many counts of TREASON does it take to “disqualify” these enemies of the republic?


8 posted on 12/01/2015 12:23:12 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torcert

Only one (J.Q. Adams) of our first seven presidents was not considered a dangerous revolutionary in the late 1700’s. Washington, Adams, Sr., Jefferson, Madison, Monroe and Andrew Jackson were all considered revolutionaries and no-good troublemakers by the establishment of their day. ;-)


9 posted on 12/01/2015 12:34:57 PM PST by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

One should be enough - given aide and comfort to the country’s enemies should qualify.


10 posted on 12/01/2015 12:45:45 PM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

Obama and Hillary are in the other direction - against Liberty.


11 posted on 12/01/2015 12:46:44 PM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Torcert
My only point is that there is no qualification requiring support of a status quo. In fact, I prefer candidates who challenge the status quo.

If you want to debate the true meaning of "liberty" with someone, I suggest that you find a Libertarian. I am not a libertarian and thus not qualified to try to out-liberty anyone. ;-)

12 posted on 12/01/2015 12:51:15 PM PST by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

My point is that if the nation’s Socialists want to deprive the people of their civil rights by the word of some nameless bureaucrat deep in the bowels of the Feral Government, then the people should demand the same standard be applied to our ‘Leaders’.


13 posted on 12/01/2015 12:55:46 PM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Torcert
One should be enough - given aide and comfort to the country’s enemies should qualify.

Apparently Congress doesn't think so.

Giving aid and comfort to our enemy:

Obama gives the jihadists back five of their top guys in trade for a deserter????

Obama gives $150 Billion to Iran, an avowed enemy of America????

NOT repelling invasion:

Obama tries to force the immigration of most strong young men from Syria not able to sort out how many are jihadist enemies of America????

etc, etc...

14 posted on 12/01/2015 1:10:48 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Yes, and those are but a short list of all the abuses an usurpation’s the nation has endured.

If people are placed on certain lists for far less, we can surely assume that Obama and Hillary should be.


15 posted on 12/01/2015 1:25:46 PM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Torcert

I’m looking for Obama to somehow be removed, hopefully soon, before his term ends. Will it happen? I don’t know but I think maybe, I don’t care how many political traitors we have in Congress.

Although God has always been involved in the affairs of the world and especially America, I feel like He may take special steps to change America’s course for the benefit of many for a certain period of time - maybe a few decades.


16 posted on 12/01/2015 2:32:51 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Sooner or later he will have to be removed - the GOP should not be taking that ‘off the table’ at every opportunity.

I hope and pray that God has a plan for good that we cannot discern.


17 posted on 12/01/2015 3:25:56 PM PST by Torcert (Che Guevara is DEAD - Get Over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Torcert

I sense a change coming and I also sense it will surprise a lot of people for good.

God is always wanting to show people how good he is. We may get to see just that in the coming few years and decades. I believe it will be an amazing time of God’s glory - maybe a last in-gathering around the world before He takes his Bride and it all comes crashing down.

This isn’t to say there won’t be trouble and increased darkness. But I’m looking for His Glory to shine out and dispel much of the darkness until that Day comes.


18 posted on 12/01/2015 3:50:53 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson