Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kasich's Bad Idea
Townhall.com ^ | November 26, 2015 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 11/26/2015 6:48:19 AM PST by Kaslin

Conservatives are supposed to be against big government and opposed to the left's belief that problems can and should be solved by Washington.

Which is why Ohio governor and Republican presidential candidate John Kasich's proposal to create a new government agency to promote "Judeo-Christian values" is a really bad idea.

Put aside for a moment that the federal government does few things well, or within budget, and consider also how preposterous and unworkable such an idea would be.

In a speech at the National Press Club in Washington last week, Kasich, who grew up Catholic and remains a man of Christian faith, said he thinks the U.S. needs such an agency to help the country be "more forceful in the battle of ideas." He added, "U.S. public diplomacy and international broadcasting have lost their focus on the case for Western values and ideals and effectively countering your opponents' propaganda and disinformation."

Here is a short list of the many problems with such a proposal.

Problem No. 1: Who would represent the "Judeos" and the "Christians"? Would it be an Orthodox or reformed Jew? Would a Jewish mystic from the Kabbalah sect be included? There are numerous Christian denominations and sects, so how would Kasich select one as representative of Christianity? Would those left out protest? Would there be lawsuits, not only from excluded religious groups, but from the ACLU? Church-state separation, you know.

Problem No. 2: What "values" would be promoted? Certainly not, one would hope, cultural values, as displayed in many Hollywood films and on television. Are the "traditional values" Kasich supports even practiced by a majority of Americans in an age when we seem to tolerate everything (except traditional values) and when the Kardashians take up far too much brain space? Who would be the ultimate decider on which "values" to promote? And what about people who seek to promote values different from Kasich's?

Problem No. 3: Do we really want to turn over what ought to be the responsibility and privilege of individual religious believers to the federal government, which can't even save dollars taken from taxpayers, much less the souls of individual citizens? Too many churches, especially, have retreated from their responsibility to apply their faith to those who are hungry, homeless and imprisoned. Tax-exempt ministries now do the work individuals have been commanded to do.

Problem No. 4: How do you promote American "values" to secular and Islamic societies, which mostly do not share them? Who has the credibility to speak for and represent such values, even if they could be agreed upon?

A president can promote values by talking about them and endorsing individuals and programs that practice them. The Voice of America and Radio Liberty used to broadcast American values to the world during the Cold War, but in the Internet age, broadcasting, which can be easily jammed, is probably not as effective as the web.

In order for a country to promote something, it must first practice it. A better idea would be to allow school choice so that poor children especially can be liberated from failing public schools and given a chance for a better life. A good education is a value that can be enhanced by the federal government getting out of the way and busting the last major monopoly in the country: public education.

Kasich rightly laments the loss of some core values most Americans once embraced. It wasn't the federal government that got rid of most of them -- though the Supreme Court played a role. Rather, it is we the people who have chosen to live by different values to our detriment and shame. If they are to return, it will take the work of those "Judeo-Christians" and not the dysfunctional federal government.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: HarleyLady27; BillyBoy; LS; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued

Selling weed? Really?

It’s also been alleged that he chased tail with his pal, Gary Condit.

Reports are he’s a mean SOB in person despite his public persona.


21 posted on 11/26/2015 10:06:14 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Alleged, nothing. This guy would have sex scandals galore with all the interns he banged in DC. One reason the media would love to see Kay Sick be the nominee.


22 posted on 11/26/2015 10:11:40 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Impy
>> Reports are he's a mean SOB in person despite his public persona. <<

Heh. Mean SOB Kasish? Very bizarre. He seems extremely milquetoast and docile in public appearances. Reminds me of Bill Cosby's private life with the oodles of sexual predator/rape drug allegations in contrast to the loveable G-rated family man on screen persona.

Another guy who's supposedly the opposite of his public career is Christopher Guest of the National Lampoon, Saturday Night Live, and "This Is Spinal Tap" fame. All his material is hilarious over-the-top mockumentaries, usually of musical acts ("A Mighty Wind" was a dead-on biting satire of druggie out peacenik hippie folk bands) and he appears on screen portraying really silly caricatures. Off screen, people describe Guest as humorless, "ultra-serious" and "dour". Apparently he gets extremely irritated when people even USE the term "mockumentary" since he thinks it belittles his satirist "art", and gets pissed off when he meets people "want me to be funny. I rarely joke unless I'm in front of a camera. It's not what I am in real life. It's what I do for a living."

23 posted on 11/27/2015 12:02:42 AM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
He seems extremely milquetoast and docile in public appearances.

He's a freaking snake in the grass. And an enemy of conservatives and Tea Party people. Enough said !!!

24 posted on 11/27/2015 12:17:20 AM PST by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson