Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama A ‘Bad President,’ He’s ’Not Going To Stop’ At Just 10,000 Syrian Refugees
Breitbart ^ | 11/19/15 | Matthew Boyle

Posted on 11/19/2015 11:34:49 AM PST by Enlightened1

Donald Trump, the 2016 GOP presidential frontrunner, says President Obama is "not going to stop" at just a handful of Syrian refugees.

"You know Obama wants to bring not the 10,000, not the 15,000, not even the 65,000 that they talked about in the Democrat debate," Trump tells Breitbart News Daily with Stephen K. Bannon. "Obama wants to bring, I hear, between 200,000 and 250,000 into the country. That's what I hear the number is."

Trump added on the show, which airs on Sirius XM Patriot Channel 125, that Obama is a "bad president" because of all of this.

"You know he's not going to stop. If he got 60 or 65 [thousand], you know he's not going to stop," Trump said.

This man--he's so bad. He's such a bad president, we have so many problems in our country and now we're going to have to worry about ISIS being on our shores? By the way, we already have--we have tremendous numbers of people that are ISIS or ISIS-related already in our country.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Syria; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: obama; refugees; syrian; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Amendment10
Amendment10:"(#1)The U.N. seems to be unthinkingly saying that the prediminately male refugees that have escaped from Syria
and who have wife and kids have left their families behind.
(#2)Also, note that the states have always had their unique, 10th Amendment-protected powers to decide what to do with refugees,
even refusing to allow refugees to enter a state imo."

( parenthesis mine):
(#1)The UN has the rules are already written in stone, under 'family reunification'. OBungler is a U.N. supporter, and I think secretely thinks he could be UN President.
(#2)The State Department has already indicated that there are no laws restricting migrants travel , from one state to another.
The State Dept. merely transports the migrant to the approved resettlement agency, and the migrant can relocate anytime and anywhere.
Pretty much the same benefits as any citizen ... at taxpayers citizen expense.

21 posted on 11/19/2015 12:40:30 PM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
RobbyS :" This I believe."

Me too !!
Has the 'Clown Prince' ever told the public any truth ?

22 posted on 11/19/2015 12:43:27 PM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Well, he said 70,000 as a first step.


23 posted on 11/19/2015 12:45:41 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

He’s a “criminal” president.


24 posted on 11/19/2015 12:54:30 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Agree 100% with your urging to elect constitutionally minded, pro 10th Amendment representatives.

But the immediate question - what protections can a governor give to keep Syrians that are allowed into some other state from moving to a state which has prohibited the direct settlement by Syrians? They are welcomed with open arms to NYC, why can they not just hop on a bus and come to any of the 37 states which prohibited them from being resettled in those states directly? We have no border patrol between one state and another...

Just wondering the legalities and possibilities here if we cant get this stopped in its tracks.


25 posted on 11/19/2015 1:08:07 PM PST by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt; All
"(#2)The State Department has already indicated that there are no laws restricting migrants travel , from one state to another. "

The states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration imo. So the State Department of the corrupt Obama Administration actually has no constitutional authority to tell any state how to deal with immigrants imo.

And the reason that the lawless Obama administration gets away with making policy for immigrants is because USA parents for many generations have not been making sure that that their children are being taught about the federal governments constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.

26 posted on 11/19/2015 1:20:00 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Dear Syrian Radical Religion of Peace Refugee Muslim,

Our Dear Leader, President Barack Hussein Obama, welcomes you to his house at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Best Regards,
World Citizen

27 posted on 11/19/2015 1:25:44 PM PST by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxlunch; All
"But the immediate question - what protections can a governor give to keep Syrians that are allowed into some other state from moving to a state which has prohibited the direct settlement by Syrians?"

This is a major problem because governors and state lawmakers are evidently not only as clueless about the federal governments constitutionally limited powers as the low-information voters who elected them probably are, but clueless about 10th Amendment-protected state powers as well.

28 posted on 11/19/2015 1:28:09 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
Amendment10 :" So the State Department of the corrupt Obama Administration actually has no constitutional authority to tell any state how to deal with immigrants imo."

I agree !

29 posted on 11/19/2015 1:28:31 PM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“Obama wants to bring, I hear, between 200,000 and 250,000 into the country. That’s what I hear the number is.”

Here in Canada, our newly-elected Liberal PM will be bringing in 25,000 ‘refugees’ -— within the next six weeks!

On a per-capita basis, that’s the equivalent of 250,000 ‘refugees’ in the U.S.A. Then there’s the ‘family reunification’ multiplier to consider.


30 posted on 11/19/2015 1:53:50 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
This man--he's so bad. He's such a bad president, we have so many problems in our country and now we're going to have to worry about ISIS being on our shores?

Trump has a gift for explaining simple issues simply - talking over the heads of the media and other politicians directly to the public. Just like Ronald Reagan did, so long ago...

Jeb Bush would have said the same thing like this: "Studies bythe Institute for Immigration Policy have show that up to 6.9% of refugees entering the county have had contact with terror-connected groups in the last 18 months. It is imprudent to expand efforts at resettlement until after further efforts are made at vetting these individuals."

And after Joe Sixpack's eyes glaze over, he completely misses the Republican position and votes for the guy who promised him free health care.

31 posted on 11/20/2015 6:07:55 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson