I personally don't care to see those Cialis ads either, but that's because they're tacky...
Having said that, unless they're false, they should be voluntarily eliminated because of taste...not because of eeeeeevvvvvviiiiiillllll capitalism.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: markomalley
2 posted on
11/17/2015 4:52:27 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: markomalley
In an addendum, the FDA has ruled that Cialis may not be prescribed to attorneys. Apparently it just makes them taller.
3 posted on
11/17/2015 4:53:11 PM PST by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: markomalley
I'm wondering when the first product liability suit will come along by some disgruntled consumer who didn't get the four-hour erection.
"I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist." |
4 posted on
11/17/2015 4:54:21 PM PST by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN - 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
To: markomalley
Cialis is one of the tamer ads. Those side effects can be down right entertaining.
The real problem is doctors wives don’t want the little nubile young hotties going around to the doctor’s office selling their wares.
To: markomalley
Didn’t the AMA endorse Hussein ObamaCare?
I think they’ve become a bought off liberal group sort of like what happened to the Chamber of Commerce.
6 posted on
11/17/2015 4:54:53 PM PST by
boycott
(--)
To: markomalley
These days, if the AMA is against something, I'm for it and vice versa. Remember that the AMA pushed for Obamacare.
To: markomalley
Chiropractors and physical therapists will fight any attempt by the government to remove Cialis advertisements.
9 posted on
11/17/2015 4:57:33 PM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
(Tony Schwartz and Meredith McIver, a couple of dam* fine authors...)
To: markomalley
The AMA are a bunch of communists. About 25% of doctors belong and those are usually new doctors looking for benefits from the AMA. The AMA is a joke and has helped destroy healthcare in America.
10 posted on
11/17/2015 4:58:05 PM PST by
CodeToad
(Stupid kills, but not nearly enough!)
To: markomalley
—personally, I’d be happy to see NO ads for anything used internally or externally for anything from split ends to toenail fungus, but I don’t want the AMA deciding what I see -——
11 posted on
11/17/2015 4:58:12 PM PST by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: markomalley
We were watching a TV show the other night, and 80% of the ads were for drugs.....................
12 posted on
11/17/2015 5:00:38 PM PST by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: markomalley
Ending prescription drug advertising, coupled with real tort reform, is the only way to have true “health care reform”.
17 posted on
11/17/2015 5:03:50 PM PST by
lightman
(O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance, giving to Thy Church vict'ry o'er Her enemies.)
To: markomalley
"The American Medical Association on Tuesday called for a ban on consumer advertising for prescription drugs and medical devices, saying such marketing could be driving demand for unnecessary expensive treatments."The AMA has been doing a pretty good job itself, "driving demand for unnecessary expensive treatments".
The AMA and pretty much everybody else had a seat at the Obamacare discussion table. Everybody except patients/consumers.
18 posted on
11/17/2015 5:06:00 PM PST by
Sooth2222
("In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve." - Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859))
To: markomalley
I don't get the thing about TWO bathtubs...
Anyway, I have a feeling this is more about the extensive listing of side effects for drugs during the commercial....
Get rid of that dry, scaly skin! Talk to your doctor about Itsmoothsya!
May cause seizures, heart failure, loss of genitalia, in some patients arms and legs fell off, blindness may occur if you are on other medication. consult your doctor or pharmacist before taking Itsmoothsya, and cease taking Itsmoothsya if you experience signs of shortness of breath, swelling of the lips or airway, a rash or hives, which may herald an allergic reaction and seek immediate medical attention...
I'll scratch, Doc!!
I think all the warnings are bad for business.
21 posted on
11/17/2015 5:10:54 PM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: markomalley
I don't like consumer-targeted drug ads, but, it's not the government or the AMA’s right to suppress distribution of information. If the ads are false, and the drugs don't work, or if they don't tell you about major side effects, then that's false advertising. Otherwise, it's free speech, and if they can afford the ad, it's their business.
If we let politicians lie as they so often do on national television, then why should be restrict drug manufacturers from telling the truth about their products?
We are now living in the USSR. It's amazing to see, and my heart is heavy.
To: markomalley
Doctors are free to not write the prescriptions.
24 posted on
11/17/2015 5:15:52 PM PST by
Adder
(No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
To: markomalley
“Having said that, unless they’re false, they should be voluntarily eliminated because of taste...not because of eeeeeevvvvvviiiiiillllll capitalism.”
Liberal MDs don’t want patients to know anything about drugs, how they work, side effects and the good things.
They want to rx generic drugs to be part of the Obama care with cookbook diagnosis and cheap drugs, which are often not as effective and as good for the patients.
Not all new drugs are better and some are definitely better for the patients.
25 posted on
11/17/2015 5:16:01 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Trump/Palin 2016. Cruz Attorney General 2017. Bolton SoS 2017. Watch liberal & GOPe heads implode!)
To: markomalley
Probably won’t happen and has far reaching implications but I would love to see end of all ads for any drugs, especially prescription drugs. How much might that save in costs?
26 posted on
11/17/2015 5:18:58 PM PST by
Reno89519
(American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
To: markomalley
My cardiologist,who's a senior faculty member at Harvard Medical School (and a longtime friend of mine),has told me that it drives him (and his collegues) up a wall when patients demand a particular medication that they saw on TV.He bemoans the time he wastes convincing those patients that while Medication X might be right for *some* people it's not right for *them*.
To: markomalley
Good!
I hate those drug commercials and their endless list of potential side-effects.
There was a time, long ago, in a far away world, prescription drug advertisements were not allowed on TV.
28 posted on
11/17/2015 5:26:22 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: markomalley
Personally I think it all should be over the counter.
30 posted on
11/17/2015 5:30:47 PM PST by
Chickensoup
(We lose our freedoms one surrender at a time)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson