Skip to comments.
[UK Labour] Jeremy Corbyn: I'm 'not happy' with shoot-to-kill policy if terrorists are attacking...
The Telegraph ^
| 11/16/15
| Ben Riley-Smith
Posted on 11/16/2015 4:59:29 PM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: markomalley
If Labour hopes to be the party of government any time within the next decade, they need to push Corbyn aside ASAP. It probably won’t help — the old British working class is tilting toward UKIP and they’ve lost Scotland to the SNP — but with Corbyn as leader, they aren’t even a serious opposition party.
21
posted on
11/16/2015 5:36:12 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
To: markomalley
“The Labour leader said he thought the policy could be âquite dangerous” and âcounterproductiveâ, warning that it could lead to âwar on the streetsâ. “
You’ve already got it, douchebag.
To: markomalley
The Labour leader said he thought the policy could be "quite dangerous" and "counterproductive", warning that it could lead to "war on the streets". The alternative is "surrender on the streets" - which I guess would be alright with Corbyn.
23
posted on
11/16/2015 5:50:49 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
To: markomalley
Sir Winston Churchill is spinning in his grave.
24
posted on
11/16/2015 5:57:10 PM PST
by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: wjcsux
would love for George Patton to go nuclear on this “purple pissing coward”.
To: tenthirteen
26
posted on
11/16/2015 6:30:04 PM PST
by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: markomalley
The Labour leader said he thought the policy could be âquite dangerous" and âcounterproductiveâ, warning that it could lead to âwar on the streetsâ. I wish we had a photo of this Brit twit to see if he looks retarded.
I suppose a massacre of unarmed civilians is preferable to "war on the streets?"
Even for a socialist Brit, that is monumentally over-the-top stupid!
27
posted on
11/16/2015 7:52:37 PM PST
by
publius911
(Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
To: markomalley
Stop! - or I shall be forced to say, “Stop” again!
Spineless moron...I’m glad that they reveal themselves at times like this.
28
posted on
11/16/2015 9:45:14 PM PST
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
To: markomalley
What a typical idiot - seems to either no understand 9or care) that the terrorists have no such compunctions and that failure to kill them only increases the body count of innocents.
One must wonder if he followed his complaint up with a "Alla Who? Ack Bar!"
29
posted on
11/17/2015 3:20:49 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: markomalley
Meh, let him make these inane comments, just makes more Brits vote against him and for the Tories or UKIP.
To: rbg81
The Lab party were in such a post-election shambles this clown managed to sell people his huckster cure for all ills. Gormless Red Ed was Churchill compared to this idiot.
To: rbg81
Quite simple. A lot of UK lefties paid a £3 to register as a “supporter” and gamed the UK Labour party’s new selection process
32
posted on
11/17/2015 7:18:11 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
('Life is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy for those who feel' - Horace Walpole)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson